Workflow
平台内容审核机制
icon
Search documents
“三女共侍一夫”,宝宝巴士擦边,给自己捅了一刀
Xin Lang Cai Jing· 2025-10-30 06:21
来源:电商天下 低俗擦边被全网审判,宝宝巴士摊上事了 没想到都2025年了,"放我下去这不是去幼儿园的车"这个古早梗,还能在宝宝巴士身上照进现实。 开屏擦边,宝宝巴士摊上事了 在数字时代摸爬滚打的我们,或许早已习惯各种软件中"开屏广告"的存在。 从最开始的读秒跳过,到后来的摇一摇跳转,再到如今,明明好像哪里都没碰,就已经打开了广告链接。 而比起花样百出的跳转方式,更令人恼火的无疑是广告内容—— 除了无缝切换到电商平台,有些广告已经悄然越过红线,植入低俗擦边内容,甚至连孩子都不放过。 就在近日,有网友举报,在打开"宝宝巴士儿歌"APP的过程中,赫然跳出一张擦边直播封面,极具诱导意味。 根据网传录屏画面显示,彼时开屏页面上是一名躺在床上的女主播,嘴里塞着红布,穿着暴露,持续扭动着身体; 而画面旁边的文字说明更是露骨:"三女共侍一夫,每月50万生活费"。 值得一提的是,这并非孤例—— 不少家长反馈称,自家孩子点开早教APP后,手机后台自动跳转、植入了大量涉黄擦边内容,一不留神,手机里便多了几个"奇怪"的应用程 序。 而如今,就连"宝宝巴士"这个早教领域的老面孔,都没能幸免,成了家长踩雷的典型。 要知道,作为服务全球 ...
自媒体发布上百条偷拍女性私密视频!“恶意偷拍”该如何界定?
Qi Lu Wan Bao· 2025-09-11 07:33
Core Viewpoint - A short video platform account has been exposed for posting over 120 videos of women without consent, focusing on their bodies and receiving significant engagement, raising serious privacy and legal concerns [1][3]. Group 1: Incident Overview - The account has 28,000 followers and appears to monetize its content through a paid "benefit group" [3]. - Videos were primarily filmed in public places like subways and malls, highlighting women's body parts with suggestive captions [3]. - Following the exposure, the platform announced on September 7 that it had indefinitely banned the account for repeatedly posting content that infringes on personal privacy [7]. Group 2: Legal Implications - Establishing a paid group to share private videos may violate multiple laws, including criminal, civil, and administrative responsibilities [8]. - Criminally, the actions could constitute offenses such as producing, selling, or distributing obscene materials for profit, and infringing on personal information rights [8]. - Civilly, the actions violate privacy rights and personal information protection laws, leading to potential liabilities for damages and public apologies [9]. - Administratively, the behavior could result in penalties such as detention or fines under public security laws [9]. Group 3: Distinction Between Legal and Illegal Filming - The distinction between "reasonable filming" and "malicious filming" hinges on the nature of the location, purpose, and methods used [10]. - Legal filming purposes include news reporting, public safety monitoring, and artistic creation, while filming private areas without consent is illegal [10]. - Filming in public requires adherence to specific obligations to avoid infringing on others' rights [11]. Group 4: Platform Responsibilities - Platforms must enhance user content management to prevent the spread of private videos, complying with relevant laws and regulations [12]. - Pre-upload content screening should involve image recognition and keyword filtering, followed by manual checks for suspected violations [12]. - Continuous monitoring and user complaint mechanisms are essential for timely responses to violations [12]. - User agreements should explicitly prohibit "filming and sharing private content," with mechanisms in place to restrict users with low credit scores [12].