Core Viewpoint - The article highlights a case of administrative enforcement in a county in Henan, where the local fire rescue team imposed rigid monthly penalties, indicating a shift from public safety to revenue generation in administrative law enforcement [1][2]. Group 1: Administrative Enforcement Issues - The county's fire rescue team set a monthly target for administrative penalties, requiring each street and town to issue at least 2 penalties with fines between 2000-2500 yuan, leading to uniformity in enforcement actions [1]. - The essence of administrative enforcement is to protect public interest and ensure safety, but the focus on revenue generation can lead to selective or excessive enforcement, neglecting real risks [1][3]. Group 2: Government Response and Oversight - The local administrative enforcement supervision bureau intervened quickly upon discovering the issue, issuing a corrective opinion, which reflects the positive role of internal oversight mechanisms [2]. - The Ministry of Justice has highlighted this case as part of a broader initiative to regulate administrative enforcement practices, demonstrating a commitment to lawful administration at the central level [2]. Group 3: Recommendations for Systemic Change - To fundamentally eliminate such issues, reforms are needed at both the institutional and regulatory levels, including strict adherence to the prohibition of profit-driven enforcement and the elimination of penalty quotas [3]. - There is a need to strengthen financial discipline and implement a clear separation of penalty collection and departmental revenue to sever the link between enforcement actions and economic interests [3]. - Enhancing the enforcement assessment system to prioritize quality and public satisfaction over mere quantity is essential for improving enforcement practices [3].