Workflow
教育资金冻结
icon
Search documents
“非法扣留”国会拨款,最新裁决“火上浇油”,美20余州起诉联邦政府冻结教育资金
Huan Qiu Shi Bao· 2025-07-15 22:54
Core Viewpoint - The U.S. government's decision to freeze approximately $6.8 billion in education funding has led to widespread criticism and a lawsuit from Democratic officials across 24 states and Washington D.C., claiming the action is illegal and violates federal laws [1][2]. Group 1: Lawsuit and Government Response - The lawsuit, led by California, accuses President Trump and Education Secretary McMahon of "illegally withholding" congressional appropriations, arguing that the funding freeze disrupts various educational and assistance programs [1]. - The freeze was announced just before the funds were scheduled to be disbursed, with the Education Department stating that the funds were under review to ensure compliance with Trump's policy priorities [1][2]. - The White House's budget office indicated that some funds were allegedly being misused to support "radical left agendas," further complicating the situation [1]. Group 2: Political Reactions - Despite the lawsuit being initiated by Democrats, Republican officials have also criticized the funding freeze, highlighting its significant impact on their congressional districts and calling for the release of the funds [2]. - On the same day the lawsuit was filed, the U.S. Supreme Court lifted a previous injunction, allowing Trump to continue his plan to dissolve the Education Department, which includes significant staff reductions [2]. - The Supreme Court's decision faced opposition from three liberal justices, who warned that the dissolution of the Education Department could lead to severe harm to students and educational opportunities [2][3]. Group 3: Advocacy and Opposition - The President of the National Parents Union condemned the Supreme Court's ruling, claiming it prioritizes politics over constitutional rights and endangers millions of students [3]. - Various Democratic attorneys general, school districts, and unions have expressed their opposition, with advocacy groups pledging to use all legal means to protect the right to education for youth [3].