Workflow
教育采购腐败
icon
Search documents
护眼灯采购价差五倍,如何让人不疑
Nan Fang Du Shi Bao· 2025-12-09 12:33
Core Viewpoint - The procurement of eye-protection lamps in Xiangning County, Shanxi Province, has raised concerns due to significant price discrepancies between the winning bid and actual market prices, suggesting potential issues in the procurement process [1][2]. Group 1: Procurement Process - The procurement process for the eye-protection lamps involved a formal bidding procedure, overseen by the government procurement center and evaluated by the finance bureau, which included expert assessments [1]. - The local education technology bureau defended the procurement, stating that the lamps were purchased through intermediaries, which contributed to the higher prices compared to factory direct costs [1]. Group 2: Price Discrepancies - The winning bid for the eye-protection lamps was significantly higher than market prices, with lamps that could be purchased for over 100 yuan being procured for 780 yuan each, raising suspicions about the procurement's legitimacy [2]. - Comparisons were made to other procurement irregularities, such as a router priced at 750,000 yuan that was available for only 299 yuan online, highlighting a pattern of questionable procurement practices in educational institutions [2]. Group 3: Importance of Eye-Protection Measures - The emphasis on eye-protection measures in schools is underscored by a directive from the Ministry of Education, which includes implementing standards for lighting that supports eye health in educational settings [3]. - The procurement issues in Xiangning County serve as a reminder that initiatives aimed at protecting children's eyesight could be compromised by corruption, necessitating thorough investigations and accountability in similar future projects [3].