摘要： 市场监管总局印发《检验检测从业人员监督管理工作指引》，明确从业要求、行为规范及信用监 管措施，强化资质管理与责任追究，推动行业诚信建设，营造良好市场环境。 特别提示 微信机制调整，点击顶部"仪器信息网" → 右上方"…" → 设为 ★ 星标，否则很可能无法看到我 们的推送。 2月2 6日， 为加强对检验检测行业从业人员监管 ，市场监督总局发布 《检验检测从业人员监 督管理工作指引》（后简称《指引》）。 旨在通过明确各方责任、规范从业行为、建立信用体 系，来提升检验检测数据的公信力，营造公平有序的市场环境。 《 指引 》明确了"谁签字谁负责"的主体责任，列出从业人员必须遵守的准则和禁止的行为， 要求对关键岗位人员信息统一管理。 《 指引 》要求强化监督检查，通过能力验证持续考核相关人员。同时通过建立信用记录和"黑 名单"对从业者实施信用监管。 《 指引 》的推出和实施将 检验检测工作的责任前所未有地压实到个人，对从业人员产生了深 远影响： 个人责任空前加大，职业风险显著提高 终身追责："谁出证，谁负责；谁签字，谁担责"的原则被正式写入《指引》。这意味着检测报 告上的每一个签名，都可能成为未来追责的依据， ...

Core Points - The market regulatory authorities are intensifying efforts to combat fraudulent practices in the inspection and testing industry to protect consumer rights and maintain industry credibility [1] Group 1: Regulatory Actions - Regulatory bodies have revoked inspection and testing qualifications from several institutions involved in serious violations, including issuing false reports and obtaining qualifications through deceitful means [1] - Specific cases highlighted include companies such as Zunyi Shunchangjie Motor Vehicle Testing Co., Ltd. and Chengdu Youde Motor Vehicle Testing Co., Ltd., which issued false vehicle inspection reports [1] Group 2: Case Studies - Zhongshoujian (Shenzhen) Jewelry Testing Co., Ltd. was found to have issued 3,100 false certification documents for precious metal products without actual testing, leading to a fine of 100,000 yuan and the cancellation of its testing qualifications [2] - Yulin Tianxiong Automobile Testing Co., Ltd. obtained its testing qualifications through forged documents and false materials, resulting in the revocation of its certification by the Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region market regulatory authority [3]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the draft of the "Supervision and Management Measures for Inspection and Testing Practitioners (Trial) (Draft for Comments)", which focuses on enhancing the supervision of personnel in the inspection and testing industry, clarifying responsibilities, standardizing behaviors, and strengthening credit management to establish a closed-loop regulatory system and maintain market order [2][3]. Group 1 - The draft aims to strengthen supervision over inspection and testing institutions and their personnel, emphasizing the importance of the "human" element in the industry [2][3]. - Practitioners are required to adhere to laws, regulations, and professional ethics, ensuring that inspection and testing processes are scientific, accurate, and traceable [2][3]. - The draft specifies that key positions such as technical and quality managers must possess relevant professional qualifications and be familiar with applicable laws and standards [3]. Group 2 - The draft establishes a management system for practitioners, including education and training, capability assessment, and credit evaluation, guiding institutions to fulfill their management responsibilities [3]. - A credit risk classification management system will be implemented, creating credit files for practitioners and enhancing the incentive and constraint mechanisms for credit evaluation [3]. - The measures will initially be trialed in certain regions, aiming to create a regulatory system characterized by institutional responsibility, regulatory constraints, credit management, and legal penalties [3].

Core Viewpoint - The revised "Supervision and Administration Measures for Inspection and Testing Institutions" by the State Administration for Market Regulation aims to strengthen industry regulation and purify the market environment in response to rampant issues in the inspection and testing industry [1][2]. Group 1: Industry Regulation - The inspection and testing sector is a crucial part of the national quality infrastructure, playing an irreplaceable role in key areas such as food, pharmaceuticals, and the environment [1]. - The revised measures include increasing the maximum fine for issuing false inspection and testing reports to 100,000 yuan, addressing the low cost of inspection fraud and the vague responsibilities of personnel [2]. Group 2: Impact on Public Safety - The authenticity of inspection and testing reports is vital for public safety, as fraudulent reports can harm not only the credibility of the industry but also the legal rights and health of consumers [2]. - The article emphasizes that merely imposing fines and clarifying responsibilities is insufficient; a collaborative governance framework involving government, enterprises, social organizations, and the public is necessary to effectively address the issues in the inspection and testing industry [2].