最高人民法院11月5日发布4件涉民营企业和民营企业家权益保护再审典型案例，包括3个刑事、1个 民事案件，为人民法院统一法律适用，准确把握政策界限，依法审理同类案件提供裁判指引。 叶某某合同诈骗再审改判无罪案，窦某某职务侵占、挪用资金、隐匿会计凭证、会计账簿再审改判 无罪案均由合同纠纷引发，但在案证据并不能证实当事人具有非法占有目的或者存在侵占、挪用等犯罪 事实。人民法院坚守刑法谦抑性原则，准确区分经济纠纷与经济犯罪，防止和纠正利用刑事手段干预经 济纠纷。 史某某、王某某诉某矿业公司、某联合集团企业出售合同纠纷再审案，坚持民营企业和国有企业法 律地位平等，充分体现人民法院对各类经营主体的依法平等保护。 最高法表示，将进一步推动涉企产权冤错案件依法甄别纠正常态化机制化，为加快构建高水平社会 主义市场经济体制提供更加有力的司法服务和保障。（记者冯家顺） 刑事审判坚持罪刑法定原则，"谢某等三人虚报注册资本、私分国有资产、行贿、职务侵占再审部 分改判无罪案"中，原二审期间公司法已对资本注册制度作出了重大调整，当事人没有实缴注册资本的 行为未违反修改后的公司法规定，不再需要承担刑事责任。此案的再审裁判，充分体现了人民法院 ...

Core Points - The Supreme People's Court of China released four typical cases related to the protection of private enterprises and entrepreneurs' rights, emphasizing the importance of correcting wrongful cases involving enterprise property rights [1][2] Group 1: Legal Principles - The principle of legality in criminal law is upheld, as seen in the case where individuals were acquitted due to changes in company law regarding registered capital, indicating that their actions did not violate the revised regulations [1] - The principle of criminal law's restraint is maintained, with cases involving contract fraud and embezzlement being overturned due to insufficient evidence of criminal intent, highlighting the distinction between economic disputes and criminal offenses [1][2] Group 2: Equal Protection - The principle of equal legal protection is emphasized, ensuring that private and state-owned enterprises are treated equally under the law, which supports the establishment of a unified national market and a law-based business environment [2] - The release of these typical cases sends a strong legal signal, addressing societal concerns and allowing private enterprises and entrepreneurs to focus on their business operations without fear [2]