（来源：法治日报） 转自：法治日报 □ 本报记者 徐强 刘欣 仲裁是国际通行的商事纠纷解决机制，具有专业高效、一裁终局等优势，对一 个国家、地区的投资贸易和经济发展发挥着重要作用。 仲裁制度是涉外法治的重要组成部分。9月12 日，十四届全国人大常委会第十七次会议表决通过新修订的《中华人民共和国仲裁法》，自2026年3月1 日起施行。 司法部涉外仲裁专家委员会多位专家近日接受《法治日报》记者采访时表示，新修订的仲 裁法释放出中国在新形势下主动深化仲裁国际交流合作的积极信号，为我国仲裁事业的国际交流与合作 开启了新篇章，为培育国际一流仲裁机构、打造国际商事仲裁优选地提供法治保障。 明确发展总体要求 回应社会呼吁，新修订的仲裁法明确了仲裁机构性质——公益性非营利法人。 "这一修改明确了仲裁机 构的法律属性和社会功能，使其区别于行政机关和营利性组织，为仲裁机构的独立运作和改革发展提供 了法律依据。"专委会委员、北京仲裁委员会主任郭卫说。 新修订的仲裁法还对仲裁机构的内部治理作 出了系统性规范：在治理结构方面，首次将"建立健全内部治理结构，明确决策、执行、监督等方面的 职责权限和程序"确立为仲裁机构的法定义务。这标志着 ...

Core Viewpoint - The revised arbitration law, effective from March 1, 2026, aims to align with international standards and address the evolving needs of China's economy and foreign trade [1] Group 1: Key Changes in Arbitration Law - The new arbitration law consists of eight chapters and ninety-six articles, focusing on enhancing the foreign-related arbitration system and internal governance of arbitration institutions [1] - The law expands the scope of foreign-related arbitration cases and introduces a system for arbitration venues, promoting international cooperation among arbitration institutions [2] - A significant addition is the provision for "temporary arbitration," allowing parties to select arbitrators outside of established arbitration institutions for specific foreign-related disputes [2][3] Group 2: Challenges in Implementation - Experts express concerns about the varying levels of arbitration institutions across different regions, which may hinder the effective implementation of the new temporary arbitration system [3] - The disparity in service capabilities and the understanding of arbitration among local courts could pose challenges for the new regulations to take root in less developed areas [3][4] Group 3: Strengthening Arbitration Institutions - As of August 2025, there are 285 legally established arbitration institutions in China, but there are significant differences in their operational capabilities and the quality of arbitrators [4] - The revised law addresses internal governance issues within arbitration institutions, emphasizing the need for improved supervision and transparency [5] Group 4: External Supervision and Support - The new law introduces external administrative supervision, allowing the Ministry of Justice to guide and oversee arbitration work, which has raised concerns about potential administrative interference [6] - The law enhances the support from people's courts regarding preservation and evidence collection, ensuring timely processing of applications related to arbitration [7][8]