梅斯上诉法院的裁决引发了法国各界的不满，认为这是对2019年通过的"反体罚法"的倒退。总检察长随 后将此案上诉至最高法院。最高法院认为，司法系统不能以"司法习惯"为由允许父母对儿童的暴力行 为。此外，受害者未满15岁，施暴者又是其监护人，这更应加重量刑。最高法院撤销了梅斯上诉法院的 判决，将此案发回南锡上诉法院重审，并重申"法国法律中不存在所谓的'父母惩罚权'，且根据施行多 年的《民法典》，父母在行使权力时不得使用暴力或心理虐待。" 米拉家的民事律师表示："这是对陈旧观念的终结，梅斯上诉法院对体罚的宽容还处于上一个时代。最 高法院让此事重回正轨。"法国儿童基金会主席也表示，最高法院的裁决令人倍感宽慰，可借此持续推 动消除法国社会中根深蒂固的教育暴力行为。 来源：环球时报 【环球时报驻法国特约记者 董铭】据法国《观点》周刊近日报道，法国最高法院14日通过了一例父亲 体罚儿童案的终审，正式宣布司法中并不承认父母体罚子女的"惩罚权"，任何教育中的暴力、虐待和侮 辱行为都不合法。 报道称，该案件中的父亲伊夫·米拉于2016至2022年期间对两名未成年的儿子实施暴力体罚，多次对他 们实施打屁股、扇耳光、扯衣领、辱骂等体 ...

Group 1 - The French Supreme Court ruled that parental corporal punishment is not recognized as a "right" within the judicial system, declaring all forms of violence, abuse, and humiliation in education as illegal [1][2] - The case involved a father, Yves Mira, who subjected his two minor sons to physical punishment from 2016 to 2022, including slapping, hitting, and verbal abuse [1] - The initial ruling by the local court sentenced Mira to 18 months of suspended imprisonment and revoked his parental rights, but this was overturned by the Metz Court of Appeal, which cited an outdated "parental punishment right" [1][2] Group 2 - The Metz Court of Appeal's decision sparked widespread discontent in France, seen as a regression from the 2019 "anti-corporal punishment law" [2] - The Attorney General appealed the case to the Supreme Court, which emphasized that the judicial system cannot permit parental violence under the guise of "judicial custom" [2] - The Supreme Court's ruling was viewed as a significant step towards ending outdated views on corporal punishment, with advocates expressing hope for continued efforts to eliminate educational violence in French society [2]