Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the recent agreement between the U.S. Treasury and the G7, which exempts U.S. companies from certain foreign taxes in exchange for the withdrawal of the proposed Section 899, also known as the "retaliatory tax" [1][3]. Group 1: Agreement Details - The U.S. Treasury estimates that the agreement will prevent U.S. companies from paying over $100 billion in taxes to foreign governments over the next decade [3]. - The G7 will work to implement the agreement in the coming weeks to months, ensuring that the OECD's second pillar tax does not apply to U.S. companies [3][4]. - The OECD's international tax reform framework includes two pillars, with the second pillar aiming to impose a global minimum tax rate of around 15% to curb tax avoidance [3][4]. Group 2: Political Context - The Section 899 proposal was drafted by Republican members of the House and supported by the White House, aimed at countering discriminatory taxes imposed by several countries on U.S. companies [3][4]. - The agreement reflects a significant difference in economic models between Anglo-American countries and continental European nations, with the former favoring lower tax rates [4]. Group 3: Market Reactions - The "retaliatory tax" raised concerns on Wall Street, as it could complicate foreign investment in the U.S. and negatively impact U.S. assets [6][7]. - International investors have increasingly concentrated their investments in U.S. assets, driven by a tech boom and a strong dollar, which has raised concerns about potential market corrections [8].