Group 1 - The article highlights the issue of fraudulent "agricultural masters" exploiting online platforms to spread incorrect agricultural knowledge and sell substandard agricultural products, harming farmers' interests and eroding their trust in agricultural resources and techniques [1][2] - These fake experts utilize psychological tactics and platform algorithms to promote their misleading claims, such as "100% yield increase" and "results in days," while presenting themselves as credible figures like "chief experts" or "special professors" [1] - The sale of counterfeit agricultural products poses multiple dangers, including economic losses for farmers, long-term soil and water pollution, and potential declines in crop quality and yield due to the use of fake seeds and ineffective fertilizers and pesticides [1] Group 2 - Internet platforms are urged to take responsibility for content verification, as current scrutiny in the agricultural sector is relatively weak compared to finance and healthcare [2] - Regulatory bodies are encouraged to innovate supervision methods and establish joint enforcement mechanisms among agriculture, internet, and market regulation departments to conduct regular special rectifications and monitor abnormal sales behaviors using big data [2] - Enhancing farmers' digital literacy and ability to identify agricultural techniques is essential, with grassroots agricultural promotion departments recommended to offer training courses on verifying expert qualifications and recognizing false advertising [2]