美俄军事对峙
Search documents
向俄放话部署核潜艇后,特朗普:美核潜艇已经位于“不得不被部署的区域”
Huan Qiu Wang· 2025-08-04 06:20
Core Points - The article discusses President Trump's announcement regarding the deployment of U.S. nuclear submarines to a specific region in response to tensions with Russia [1][3] - Trump has threatened severe tariffs on Russia if a peace agreement with Ukraine is not reached within a shortened timeframe of 10 to 12 days [3] - Russian officials, including Dmitry Medvedev, have responded to Trump's threats, indicating that they are prepared for any potential escalation [3] Group 1 - Trump confirmed the deployment of nuclear submarines, stating they are in the necessary area [1][3] - The initial threat of tariffs was set at a 50-day deadline, which Trump later reduced to 10 to 12 days [3] - Medvedev characterized Trump's ultimatums as provocative and stated that Russia will decide when to negotiate [3] Group 2 - The deployment of submarines is seen by Russian officials as not a new threat, indicating their readiness to respond [3]
普京再释和谈意愿 特朗普称将部署两艘核潜艇
Xin Hua Wang· 2025-08-02 02:04
Group 1 - Russian President Putin expressed a desire to continue dialogue with Ukraine, indicating patience if Ukraine currently sees no need for contact [2][4] - The recent negotiations between Russia and Ukraine in Istanbul yielded positive outcomes, including the exchange of deceased soldiers and prisoners [4] - Putin emphasized the importance of addressing the root causes of the current crisis to facilitate peace [4] Group 2 - U.S. President Trump ordered the deployment of two nuclear submarines in response to provocative statements from Russian officials, although he did not specify the type of submarines or their deployment area [5][6] - Trump previously threatened severe tariffs on Russia if a peace agreement between Russia and Ukraine was not reached within 50 days, indicating a potential escalation in U.S. pressure on Russia [6] - Russian officials, including Medvedev, responded to U.S. threats by asserting that the timing of negotiations should not be dictated by the U.S. [6]