Core Viewpoint - The dispute between G.E.M. (邓紫棋) and her former music company, Hummingbird Music, revolves around copyright issues related to her re-recorded songs and the management of her royalties, highlighting the complexities of artist contracts and copyright laws in the music industry [1][6][9]. Group 1: Hummingbird Music's Statement - Hummingbird Music issued a statement claiming that G.E.M. violated copyright laws by releasing re-recorded versions of her songs, which were created during their contract period, and demanded the removal of these songs from online platforms [1]. - The company emphasized that the rights to the songs are registered under Hummingbird Music with global copyright organizations [1]. Group 2: G.E.M.'s Response - G.E.M. responded by asserting that her re-recordings are legally justified under statutory licensing and that she has paid the necessary fees for this process [3][4]. - She highlighted that her public performance rights have been managed by the CASH association since she was 14, allowing her to legally release the re-recorded versions globally [4][8]. Group 3: Background of the Dispute - The conflict has been ongoing since 2019, when G.E.M. terminated her contract with Hummingbird Music due to alleged breaches by the company, leading to mutual lawsuits [9]. - G.E.M. expressed that she has not received any royalties for her previous works for over six years, raising concerns about the management of her rights and earnings [6][9]. Group 4: Legal and Contractual Implications - G.E.M. pointed out the distinction between copyright ownership and recording rights, explaining that while the copyright of her songs may be disputed, the rights to public performance and broadcasting belong to her due to her association with CASH [7][8]. - She also questioned Hummingbird Music's commitment to contractual obligations, asking for the settlement of her royalties and fees that have been outstanding since 2018 [5].