Core Viewpoint - The idea of reducing the difficulty of the college entrance examination (Gaokao) to alleviate academic pressure is overly optimistic and may not achieve the intended results, potentially exacerbating the issue of excessive exam preparation [3][4]. Group 1: Current Situation of Gaokao - Many parents attribute the heavy academic burden on students to the high difficulty of the Gaokao, leading to a disconnect between daily teaching and exam standards, prompting the need for additional tutoring [3]. - The current Gaokao structure allows for high scores, with many students achieving over 700 out of 750, indicating limited room for further reduction in exam difficulty without clustering high scorers [3][4]. Group 2: Proposed Changes to Gaokao - Experts suggest shifting the focus of Gaokao from a selection mechanism to an evaluation system, where universities use Gaokao scores as one of several criteria for admission, allowing for a more comprehensive assessment of students [4][6]. - The current system creates a competitive environment where students must navigate a complex web of rankings and admission criteria, leading to anxiety and dissatisfaction with their choices [5]. Group 3: Multi-dimensional Evaluation - Transitioning to a multi-dimensional evaluation system could enhance fairness and transparency, addressing concerns about subjective factors in admissions [6]. - By allowing students to apply to multiple universities based on their preferences and qualifications, the system could improve student satisfaction and foster competition among universities [5][6].