We've both printed it out, all 23 pages. We haven't read the entirety of it. We skimmed it.But we've been talking for a while about how the the focus of the document, it it's infrastructure related, the American technology stack and the energies to support it. Is there substance to it on the side. the substance will really bear out over time at as we see a lot of uh administrations not only the Trump administration but all of its predecessors have flooded Washington with these sorts of policy directives in ...

AI regulation needs a global approach, according to Nikolaus Lang, managing director and senior partner at the Boston Consulting Group and global leader of the BCG Henderson Institute. He discusses the geopolitics of AI with Caroline Hyde and Ed Ludlow on “Bloomberg Tech.” -------- Like this video? Subscribe to Bloomberg Technology on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCrM7B7SL_g1edFOnmj-SDKg Watch the latest full episodes of "Bloomberg Technology" with Caroline Hyde and Ed Ludlow here: https://www.y ...

AI Regulation & Governance - The industry believes AI regulation should occur at the federal level due to interstate and international commerce, and the open internet [2][3] - The industry notes that a patchwork of state regulations on AI model development and deployment would hinder internet service providers and negatively impact consumers and the job market [4] - The industry points out that early state legislation on AI, such as in California, demonstrated a naive understanding of AI technology and its diverse applications [5] - The industry emphasizes that federal AI regulation is critical for job creation, economic improvement, GDP growth, and productivity [6] - The industry expresses disappointment that federal preemption of AI regulation was not included in a particular bill, considering it vital for the US economy [7] - The industry argues that AI is of national security importance and crucial for maintaining technological and economic supremacy, thus requiring federal governance [10][11] - The industry fears that 50 different sets of state regulations on AI would slow down startups and smaller companies, while benefiting a few large incumbents [13] Comparison with Other Issues - The industry differentiates AI regulation from issues like abortion, which are considered individual matters best left to state governance [9] - The industry draws parallels between the current AI regulatory landscape and the historical development of internet regulation, suggesting a need for federal standards [18][19] - The industry contrasts AI regulation with issues like gambling and cannabis, which are currently regulated at the state level, arguing that AI's impact is broader and requires a unified federal approach [14][15]

The states have stepped in repeatedly on AI regulation to fill the void created by inaction in Washington and have a vital role to play, @DaveLeeBBG says (via @opinion) https://t.co/nqg5aYNfkz ...

want to go back to a story we mentioned earlier. Senator Ran Paul says he was uninvited to a White House picnic for members of Congress and their families set to take place later today. The reason, the Kentucky Republican says it's retribution for his opposition to the budget mega bill, the president's tariffs, and other Trump policies that he has quite publicly disagreed with.Every Democrat will be invited. Every Republican will be invited, but I will be the only one disallowed to come on the grounds of th ...