US Foreign Policy & Military Actions - Bipartisan investigations are rare but occurring regarding the US military actions in the Caribbean, indicating serious concerns in Congress [3][4] - The US military's actions of bombing boats in the Caribbean without clear identification and due process are considered unconventional and worrisome [6][7] - The approach of using military force against suspected drug smugglers, instead of the Coast Guard's law enforcement procedures, is seen as an overreach and a contravention of established legal approaches [8][9] - The amassing of a large military force near Venezuela raises questions about the US's goals and potential regime change intentions in the region [10] - The handling of survivors from the strikes, specifically the decision not to bring them to the US for trial if they were indeed drug traffickers, raises suspicions [12] Secretary of Defense (Hegsth) & Administration Concerns - Secretary Hegsth is facing bipartisan criticism and investigations, potentially creating problems for the Trump administration [2][4] - Congress may demand testimony from Hegsth and other military leaders under oath, indicating a lack of trust in briefings alone [18] - The "Signalgate" issue, involving Hegsth sharing arguably classified information on an unsecured platform, is back in the news and continues to be a concern for members of Congress [20][22][24] Broader Political & Diplomatic Context - The administration's foreign policy is perceived as pivoting away from Asia and Europe, focusing more on the Western Hemisphere and homeland security [29] - The administration's approach to the Russia-Ukraine peace deal is viewed as prioritizing financial dealings over the content of the peace itself [30] - The president's denigration of Somali immigrants and the administration's anti-immigration stance raise concerns about the country's values and economic vitality [26][30][31]

Is the world at “peak Trump”? John Bolton discusses American foreign policy with @DSORennie.Watch Inside Geopolitics now https://t.co/igSb2kNYfL ...

RT Braden Giacobazzi (@MichiganBraden)In short: According to Wikileaks docs, the Soros family empire was built with direct U.S. government muscle—rigging deals to favor Soros from its inception in the 1970s—long before “philanthropy” became the cover. Decades ago, American tax dollars and government were used to build the global Soros apparatus being used to destroy the entire Western world, today.@MikeBenzCyber reveals via wikileaks documents that as early as the 1970s, the U.S. State Department actively r ...

Geopolitics & Diplomacy - The summit with Vladimir Putin represents a significant test of Donald Trump's distinctive personal diplomacy approach [1] - American foreign policy's unpredictability is highlighted [1]

Some critics tonight slamming Israel after the deaths of five Al Jazzer journalists who the network says were killed in a targeted air strike in Gaza in just the last 24 hours. The IDF says the pe one of the people killed was a Hamas leader posing as a journalist. It's all happening as even a group of more than 600 retired members of the Israeli military are now calling for an immediate end to the war in Gaza.But the Israeli prime minister appears defiant in the face of outrage over his plan to take control ...

Cold War Strategy & Geopolitics - The book is a biography of Zbigniew Brzezinski, offering insights into American foreign policy during the Cold War, particularly through the lens of Brzezinski's rivalry with Kissinger [1][3][9] - Brzezinski viewed the Soviet Union as a non-permanent entity due to its internal nationalities and reverse natural selection, contrasting with Kissinger's view of the Soviet Union as a permanent feature of the landscape [15][16][13] - Brzezinski predicted the Soviet Union's demise and the rise of an "alliance of the aggrieved," comprising countries like Russia, China, and Iran, due to America's hubristic triumphalism after the Cold War [33][36] - Brzezinski advocated for the normalization of relations with China, believing that China, unlike the Soviet Union, was not inherently fragile and would remain a significant geopolitical unit [37][40] Brzezinski's Influence & Legacy - Brzezinski's family provided access to his diaries, offering a first-hand account of historical events and his thinking [5] - Brzezinski's approach to the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan involved stoking Soviet paranoia and providing covert support to the Mujahideen, contributing to the Soviets' "Vietnam" [60][63] - Brzezinski's biggest mistake was his advice to Carter on Iran, including supporting the Shah and urging a rescue mission, reflecting a lack of understanding of Iranian dynamics [44][47] Modern Geopolitical Implications - The author suggests that Brzezinski would likely advise against a US-Russia alliance to counter China, instead favoring leveraging Russian paranoia about China to create distance between the two powers [65][68] - The author contrasts the strategic thinking of figures like Brzezinski and Kissinger with the perceived lack of expertise and strategic depth in contemporary politics [28][29] - The author highlights the shift from a bipartisan consensus on foreign policy during the Cold War to a more fragmented landscape with differing views on the nature and source of threats [30][31]