Geopolitics & Diplomacy - The summit with Vladimir Putin represents a significant test of Donald Trump's distinctive personal diplomacy approach [1] - American foreign policy's unpredictability is highlighted [1]

Some critics tonight slamming Israel after the deaths of five Al Jazzer journalists who the network says were killed in a targeted air strike in Gaza in just the last 24 hours. The IDF says the pe one of the people killed was a Hamas leader posing as a journalist. It's all happening as even a group of more than 600 retired members of the Israeli military are now calling for an immediate end to the war in Gaza.But the Israeli prime minister appears defiant in the face of outrage over his plan to take control ...

Cold War Strategy & Geopolitics - The book is a biography of Zbigniew Brzezinski, offering insights into American foreign policy during the Cold War, particularly through the lens of Brzezinski's rivalry with Kissinger [1][3][9] - Brzezinski viewed the Soviet Union as a non-permanent entity due to its internal nationalities and reverse natural selection, contrasting with Kissinger's view of the Soviet Union as a permanent feature of the landscape [15][16][13] - Brzezinski predicted the Soviet Union's demise and the rise of an "alliance of the aggrieved," comprising countries like Russia, China, and Iran, due to America's hubristic triumphalism after the Cold War [33][36] - Brzezinski advocated for the normalization of relations with China, believing that China, unlike the Soviet Union, was not inherently fragile and would remain a significant geopolitical unit [37][40] Brzezinski's Influence & Legacy - Brzezinski's family provided access to his diaries, offering a first-hand account of historical events and his thinking [5] - Brzezinski's approach to the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan involved stoking Soviet paranoia and providing covert support to the Mujahideen, contributing to the Soviets' "Vietnam" [60][63] - Brzezinski's biggest mistake was his advice to Carter on Iran, including supporting the Shah and urging a rescue mission, reflecting a lack of understanding of Iranian dynamics [44][47] Modern Geopolitical Implications - The author suggests that Brzezinski would likely advise against a US-Russia alliance to counter China, instead favoring leveraging Russian paranoia about China to create distance between the two powers [65][68] - The author contrasts the strategic thinking of figures like Brzezinski and Kissinger with the perceived lack of expertise and strategic depth in contemporary politics [28][29] - The author highlights the shift from a bipartisan consensus on foreign policy during the Cold War to a more fragmented landscape with differing views on the nature and source of threats [30][31]