Automotive safety
Search documents
X @Bloomberg
Bloomberg· 2025-12-12 13:42
Chinese carmaker Geely has opened the world’s biggest automotive safety testing center, underscoring the country’s push to play a greater role in setting global standards — particularly for electric cars https://t.co/istHjgJGPc ...
2026 Hyundai IONIQ 9 and 2026 Kia Sportage Earn 2025 IIHS TOP SAFETY PICK + Honors
Prnewswire· 2025-11-04 14:00
Core Insights - Hyundai Motor Group has reinforced its status as a global leader in automotive safety, with multiple models receiving top safety ratings from the IIHS [1][10]. Group 1: Safety Ratings Achievements - The 2026 Hyundai IONIQ 9 and 2026 Kia Sportage have earned the 2025 TOP SAFETY PICK+ (TSP+) rating, while the 2026 Hyundai SANTA CRUZ received a 2025 TOP SAFETY PICK (TSP) rating [1][2]. - Both the IONIQ 9 and Sportage achieved "Good" ratings across all IIHS evaluation categories, including front and side crash protection and forward collision prevention [2][3]. - Hyundai Motor Group has a total of 18 models awarded TSP+ or TSP ratings in 2025, comprising nine Hyundai, five Genesis, and four Kia models [4]. Group 2: Brand Performance - Hyundai ranks first among mainstream brands, with Kia in sixth place, while Genesis leads the premium brand category and ranks third overall across all evaluated brands [5]. Group 3: Recent Model Ratings - Earlier in 2025, several Hyundai models, including IONIQ 5, IONIQ 6, KONA, TUCSON, and others, received TSP+ ratings, along with Genesis and Kia models [6]. Group 4: IIHS Evaluation Standards - The IIHS has implemented stricter safety standards for 2025, requiring vehicles to achieve "Good" ratings in new rear-passenger safety evaluations to qualify for TSP+ [7][8]. - Vehicles must also achieve "Good" ratings in small overlap front and updated side crash tests, and at least "Acceptable" ratings in daytime and nighttime vehicle-to-pedestrian forward collision prevention evaluations [9].
Tesla stock drop 2% amid NHTSA scrutiny and profit declines
Invezz· 2025-10-24 16:24
Core Points - Tesla Inc. shares experienced a 2% decline on Friday, reversing the gains made in the previous session [1] - The decline was influenced by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) seeking information regarding Tesla's new driver-assistance technology [1] Company Summary - Tesla's stock performance showed volatility, with a notable drop following a period of gains [1] - The inquiry from NHTSA indicates regulatory scrutiny on Tesla's driver-assistance features, which could impact investor sentiment [1]
Tesla Door Handles Are Focus of US Safety Probe After Bloomberg Investigation
Youtube· 2025-09-16 15:37
Core Viewpoint - The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) is investigating Tesla regarding safety concerns related to Model Y doors not opening during power outages, which raises significant safety issues for owners, especially those with children [1][2][3]. Investigation Details - The investigation was prompted by incidents where Tesla owners, including a case involving a child trapped in a vehicle, experienced issues with doors not opening when the battery is depleted [2]. - Tesla has acknowledged in its manuals that doors cannot be opened from the outside if the vehicle loses power, highlighting a critical safety concern [2]. Potential Impact on Tesla - The outcome of the investigation could lead to costly implications for Tesla, particularly if it results in a recall that requires physical modifications to vehicles rather than being resolved through software updates [4]. - Historically, defect investigations do not typically lead to immediate market reactions, as they can take a long time to resolve [3].
Tesla under scrutiny: US auto safety agency investigates Elon Musk-owned company; here’s why
MINT· 2025-09-16 13:30
Group 1: Tesla's Safety Probe - Tesla Inc. is under investigation by US auto safety regulators regarding issues with door handles on certain Model Y vehicles that may trap occupants during emergencies [1][3] - The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) has initiated a preliminary evaluation focusing on the electronic door locks of specific Model Y vehicles from the 2021 model year [3][4] - A Bloomberg investigation highlighted incidents where passengers were injured or died due to being unable to open doors when power was lost, particularly after crashes [2][5] Group 2: Defect Complaints - Since 2018, over 140 defect complaints related to Tesla's door handles have been recorded in the NHTSA database, including cases of young children being trapped inside vehicles [6] Group 3: Tesla's Expansion in India - Tesla officially entered the Indian market on July 15, 2025, launching its first store in Mumbai's Bandra Kurla Complex [7] - The company plans to start selling its Model Y SUVs in India, with intentions to expand its offerings as sales grow [7]
Elon Musk's Tesla ordered to pay $329M in deadly Autopilot crash case: ‘This will open the floodgates'
New York Post· 2025-08-01 18:48
Core Viewpoint - A Miami jury found Tesla partially responsible for a fatal crash involving its Autopilot technology, ordering the company to pay over $200 million in punitive damages to the victims [1]. Group 1: Legal Outcome - The jury determined that Tesla's technology failed, attributing significant responsibility to the company rather than solely to the distracted driver [1]. - This verdict concludes a four-year legal battle, which is notable as many similar cases against Tesla have either been dismissed or settled out of court [4][11]. - The case included allegations that Tesla concealed or lost critical evidence, which was later uncovered by a forensic data expert [5][7]. Group 2: Company Response - Tesla's legal team criticized the verdict, claiming it undermines automotive safety and jeopardizes the development of life-saving technology, and announced plans to appeal the decision [8][15]. - The company has faced scrutiny for its handling of data in previous crash cases, which it has denied [6]. Group 3: Public Perception and Trust - The verdict raises questions about Tesla's reputation for safety, especially as the company aims to promote its vehicles as safe for autonomous driving [2][9]. - The plaintiffs argued that Tesla's use of the term "Autopilot" misleads consumers about the capabilities of the technology, which does not equate to full self-driving [10][12]. - The case highlighted concerns about Tesla allowing drivers to misuse the Autopilot system, particularly on roads for which it was not designed [14].