So earlier this month, the Supreme Court agreed to hear one of the most consequential cases in modern history, whether a president can unilaterally end birthright citizenship by executive order, which would override more than 150 years of settled constitutional law and redefine who is recognized as American at birth. The case, Trump versus Barbara, is a nationwide class action lawsuit brought by the American Civil Liberties Union and partners on behalf of babies who would be subject to this executive order. ...

We apologize, but we are back with Democratic Congressman Gabe of Rhode Island. I'm glad we got you back because it's important to have you in this discussion because we're discussing President Trump's attacks on the Somali community in Minnesota. You yourself uh the uh son of of people that were born outside of the country and you're raising children in the country.So given your own situation, what's your reaction to this whole attack uh to Somali in Minnesota. >> Well, thanks for having me on, Reverend. T ...

New today, a big step in the Trump administration immigration agenda as the Supreme Court agrees to decide if the president's attempts to end birthright citizenship are constitutional. It comes amid a major crackdown with applications for green cards, citizenship, and asylum paused for immigrants from 19 countries and ramped up deportations. MS Now's Jacob Soberof spoke to a college student who was detained and deported while trying to fly home for Thanksgiving.okay, you're going to come with us because you ...

Immigration Policy - Proposed freeze on ALL immigration until specific objectives are met [1] - Objectives include reforming chain migration, ending H-1B visas, addressing birthright citizenship, and vetting individuals for adherence to Sharia law [1]

Presidential Power & Legal Challenges - The report highlights President Trump's expansive view of White House power and the numerous lawsuits (over 400) challenging his authority in federal courts [1][2] - The core argument across these cases is that Trump has overstepped his constitutional authority [1] - Trade policy, particularly the imposition of tariffs by declaring a national emergency, is a significant early test of presidential power at the Supreme Court [2][3] - Courts are scrutinizing Trump's definition of an emergency and whether the administration's response is authorized under the law across various instances, including trade, sanctions, and deployment of National Guard troops [3][4] Immigration Policy & Constitutional Interpretation - The administration's aggressive deportation policy, utilizing the Alien Enemies Act, is facing legal challenges regarding due process for non-citizens [4][5] - The executive order denying American citizenship to children of illegal immigrants and temporary visitors is reinterpreting over a century of precedent regarding the 14th Amendment [6][7] - The Supreme Court's ruling on the birthright citizenship case could significantly impact the ability of federal judges to block Trump administration policies nationwide [7] Executive Branch Authority & Agency Independence - The administration's efforts to hollow out government agencies, like the Department of Education, are being challenged as an overreach of presidential authority and a violation of Congress's power [8][9] - Critics argue that the administration's actions could allow it to undo any laws it dislikes by simply firing the people who carry them out [10] - The attempt to extend control over independent government agencies, particularly the Federal Reserve, is facing scrutiny, with the Supreme Court signaling the Fed enjoys more protections from presidential intervention [11][12][13] Long-Term Implications - These cases collectively involve fundamental questions about the power of the presidency and its relationship to other branches of government and the Constitution [13] - The outcomes of these cases could define the parameters of White House authority for decades [14]

Executive Power & Judicial Review - The upcoming Supreme Court term will address the extent of presidential power, particularly regarding Trump's policies [1][3][4] - The Supreme Court will review Trump's use of worldwide tariffs, potentially impacting Congress's authority to set tariff levels [1][9] - The court will consider the president's power to fire heads of independent agencies and members of the Federal Reserve Board, raising questions about the independence of these bodies [1][2][9] - The Trump administration has had a high success rate (approximately 70%) in emergency appeals to the Supreme Court, reversing losses in lower courts (where they lost approximately 90% of cases challenging agency actions) [6] - The Supreme Court's decisions may reveal whether it is a reluctant or enthusiastic enabler of the Trump administration's policies, potentially reflecting the justices' long-held views on expanding presidential power [7][8] Societal Impact & Public Opinion - The Supreme Court may decide on fundamental questions about citizenship, including the potential end of birthright citizenship [4] - The Supreme Court might be wary of ruling against strong public opinion, particularly on issues like ending birthright citizenship [10] - The court's legitimacy is being undermined by perceived partisan rulings and decisions made without explanation, potentially impacting its ability to stand up to the administration [12][13]

FEMA and Disaster Response - Congressman Jared Bosowitz criticizes Christine Gnome's leadership at FEMA, stating she "has no idea what she's doing" and that her decisions may have caused additional deaths in Texas [2][3][4][7] - FEMA is allegedly cutting grants to states for capacity building while simultaneously telling them they need more capacity, and pausing grants of $10 billion for previously approved disasters [3] - The acting FEMA administrator, David Richardson, reportedly has zero emergency management experience and makes no decisions without Christine Gnome's approval [4] - Swiftwater rescue crews were allegedly delayed for 72 hours due to Christine Gnome's lack of approval, rendering them useless upon arrival [4][5] - Congressman Bosowitz sent a letter to the Homeland Security and Transportation Committees requesting a full investigation into FEMA's decision-making timeline and deviation from protocols [7] - FEMA is deemed "mandatory" and essential for states like Mississippi, Louisiana, Alabama, South Carolina, and North Carolina to avoid bankruptcy after disasters [9][10][11] - There is a bipartisan bill to remove FEMA from Homeland Security to improve its speed and efficiency [9][10] - The regional administrator position in Florida (Region 4) is currently vacant, and regional offices are reportedly 20-30% empty due to forced departures [16] - Secretary of Homeland Security Christy Gnome allegedly delayed the federal response to deadly flooding in Texas for more than 3 days [31] - Secretary Gnome required direct approval of any DHS contract worth more than $100,000, creating a bottleneck and delay in disaster relief efforts [31] - A $3 million grant dedicated to creating a state-of-the-art system to warn local communities quickly about extreme weather was canceled [35] Tariffs and Trade - President Trump is threatening a new 35% tariff on goods from Canada and blanket tariffs of 15-20% on all remaining countries [29] - Mike Pence states that tariffs are a tax, and American consumers and businesses ultimately pay almost all of that cost, potentially leading to a $3,000 increase in the cost of goods for the average American household [29] - A 20% tariff on goods from Canada could lead to higher prices and empty shelves in the United States, potentially exceeding the worst inflation rate under Biden [29] Russia and Ukraine - The US is resuming deliveries of some weapons to Ukraine [29] - Secretary of State Marco Rubio met with Russia's foreign minister to exchange "new ideas" about ending the war, despite a massive Russian attack on Kyiv [29] - House Speaker Mike Johnson and Senate Majority Leader John Thun are prepared to move forward with new sanctions on Russia [29] - President Trump will have a major statement on Russia come Monday [29] Birthright Citizenship - A federal district court judge in New Hampshire issued a nationwide injunction to stop Donald Trump's executive order denying birthright citizenship to babies born in the US [24] - The judge certified a class-action lawsuit of babies born in the US who could be denied citizenship by Donald Trump's order [25] - The executive order allegedly violates the 14th amendment to the US Constitution and conflicts with binding Supreme Court precedent [28] Justice Department and Political Interference - A lawyer in the Trump Justice Department, Erez Reveni, was fired for telling a federal judge the truth about an immigration case [16] - Politico obtained emails and text messages showing that Emil Bove, a former criminal defense lawyer for Donald Trump, played a key role in a decision to deport Venezuelan immigrants to El Salvador despite a judge's order [17][18] - CIA Director John Ratcliffe allegedly ordered analysts to review the 2016 intelligence assessment on Russian interference in the election, but the review validated the original findings [36][37][38][39] - The Senate Intelligence Committee's 1300-page report confirms that Russia interfered in the election to denigrate Hillary Clinton and help Donald Trump [53][54][55]

Legal & Judicial Developments - A federal judge in New Hampshire issued a preliminary injunction temporarily blocking the Trump administration's executive order ending birthright citizenship [1] - The judge also granted class-action status to a lawsuit seeking to protect babies who would be denied birthright citizenship [1] - The ruling comes two weeks after a Supreme Court decision imposing new limits on the judiciary's ability to issue nationwide injunctions [2] - The judge issued a nationwide injunction on birthright citizenship, arguing it's different due to the class action lawsuit brought on behalf of potential parents on student visas [3][4] - The executive order applied not just to undocumented immigrants, but anyone without permanent legal status, meaning children of those on student visas would not be US citizens [4][5] - The Supreme Court may need to decide if a district judge can issue a nationwide injunction in a class action suit, impacting district court reach and birthright citizenship [5] - No judge in America has ruled Trump's executive order (children born to people not permanently in the country are not citizens) is legal, but absent a nationwide injunction, it could go into effect in some places [8] Potential Future Implications - This class action route could be a potential roadmap for other plaintiffs seeking nationwide injunctions on various issues [9] - Both Republican conservatives and liberals could see this as a workaround to achieve nationwide injunctions by finding a class (like students) that exists across the country [9]

Legal & Political Implications - A judge has blocked Trump's birthright order following a Supreme Court ruling [1] Industry Impact - The ruling potentially impacts industries reliant on immigrant labor or those affected by immigration policies [1]

Legal & Policy Developments - A federal judge in New Hampshire issued a nationwide block against President Trump's order to end birthright citizenship [1] - The judge granted class action status to the plaintiff but excluded parents of children whose citizenship is threatened from the protected class [1][8] - The ACLU filed a class action lawsuit following a Supreme Court decision limiting nationwide injunctions [6] - The ruling is expected to protect over 150,000 children born in the US this year, ensuring their constitutional birthright citizenship [7] Immigration Raids & Conditions - Several groups, including the city of Los Angeles, are suing the Trump administration over immigration raids [2] - Individuals are reportedly being racially profiled and swept up in immigration raids, with constitutional rights being violated [16][17] - Detainees are allegedly held in deplorable conditions, with limited access to water and counsel [18][19] - Lawyers have faced force, including tear gas, while trying to protect people's rights [19] Potential Consequences & Concerns - There are concerns about potential chaos and a humanitarian crisis if 28 states start revoking birthright citizenship [11] - The question of what happens to stateless individuals, particularly those who cannot be repatriated, is raised [12] - Concerns are expressed about the dehumanization of people and the potential for the administration to deprive people of their citizenship [14] - Comparisons are being made between ICE force and vigilantes or Gestapo due to perceived impunity [23]