Tomorrow marks the first day of a consequential Supreme Court term where justices will have to make final verdicts on Donald Trump's efforts to consolidate power in the executive branch. On the docket early next month, the court hears arguments over Trump's sweeping worldwide tariffs and whether he can usurp Congress's power to set tariff levels. In December, the court will consider if it can overturn a decades old ruling protecting the heads of independent agencies after Trump fired the sole remaining Demo ...

FEMA and Disaster Response - Congressman Jared Bosowitz criticizes Christine Gnome's leadership at FEMA, stating she "has no idea what she's doing" and that her decisions may have caused additional deaths in Texas [2][3][4][7] - FEMA is allegedly cutting grants to states for capacity building while simultaneously telling them they need more capacity, and pausing grants of $10 billion for previously approved disasters [3] - The acting FEMA administrator, David Richardson, reportedly has zero emergency management experience and makes no decisions without Christine Gnome's approval [4] - Swiftwater rescue crews were allegedly delayed for 72 hours due to Christine Gnome's lack of approval, rendering them useless upon arrival [4][5] - Congressman Bosowitz sent a letter to the Homeland Security and Transportation Committees requesting a full investigation into FEMA's decision-making timeline and deviation from protocols [7] - FEMA is deemed "mandatory" and essential for states like Mississippi, Louisiana, Alabama, South Carolina, and North Carolina to avoid bankruptcy after disasters [9][10][11] - There is a bipartisan bill to remove FEMA from Homeland Security to improve its speed and efficiency [9][10] - The regional administrator position in Florida (Region 4) is currently vacant, and regional offices are reportedly 20-30% empty due to forced departures [16] - Secretary of Homeland Security Christy Gnome allegedly delayed the federal response to deadly flooding in Texas for more than 3 days [31] - Secretary Gnome required direct approval of any DHS contract worth more than $100,000, creating a bottleneck and delay in disaster relief efforts [31] - A $3 million grant dedicated to creating a state-of-the-art system to warn local communities quickly about extreme weather was canceled [35] Tariffs and Trade - President Trump is threatening a new 35% tariff on goods from Canada and blanket tariffs of 15-20% on all remaining countries [29] - Mike Pence states that tariffs are a tax, and American consumers and businesses ultimately pay almost all of that cost, potentially leading to a $3,000 increase in the cost of goods for the average American household [29] - A 20% tariff on goods from Canada could lead to higher prices and empty shelves in the United States, potentially exceeding the worst inflation rate under Biden [29] Russia and Ukraine - The US is resuming deliveries of some weapons to Ukraine [29] - Secretary of State Marco Rubio met with Russia's foreign minister to exchange "new ideas" about ending the war, despite a massive Russian attack on Kyiv [29] - House Speaker Mike Johnson and Senate Majority Leader John Thun are prepared to move forward with new sanctions on Russia [29] - President Trump will have a major statement on Russia come Monday [29] Birthright Citizenship - A federal district court judge in New Hampshire issued a nationwide injunction to stop Donald Trump's executive order denying birthright citizenship to babies born in the US [24] - The judge certified a class-action lawsuit of babies born in the US who could be denied citizenship by Donald Trump's order [25] - The executive order allegedly violates the 14th amendment to the US Constitution and conflicts with binding Supreme Court precedent [28] Justice Department and Political Interference - A lawyer in the Trump Justice Department, Erez Reveni, was fired for telling a federal judge the truth about an immigration case [16] - Politico obtained emails and text messages showing that Emil Bove, a former criminal defense lawyer for Donald Trump, played a key role in a decision to deport Venezuelan immigrants to El Salvador despite a judge's order [17][18] - CIA Director John Ratcliffe allegedly ordered analysts to review the 2016 intelligence assessment on Russian interference in the election, but the review validated the original findings [36][37][38][39] - The Senate Intelligence Committee's 1300-page report confirms that Russia interfered in the election to denigrate Hillary Clinton and help Donald Trump [53][54][55]

In the meantime, going to follow some significant developments today in the ongoing legal fight over the Trump administration's attempt to end birthright citizenship. A federal judge in New Hampshire issued a preliminary injunction today, temporarily blocking President Trump's executive order ending birthright citizenship. The judge also granted classaction status to a lawsuit seeking to protect babies who would be denied birthright citizenship by the administration.Joining me now is NBC News senior Homelan ...

Legal & Political Implications - A judge has blocked Trump's birthright order following a Supreme Court ruling [1] Industry Impact - The ruling potentially impacts industries reliant on immigrant labor or those affected by immigration policies [1]

Legal & Policy Developments - A federal judge in New Hampshire issued a nationwide block against President Trump's order to end birthright citizenship [1] - The judge granted class action status to the plaintiff but excluded parents of children whose citizenship is threatened from the protected class [1][8] - The ACLU filed a class action lawsuit following a Supreme Court decision limiting nationwide injunctions [6] - The ruling is expected to protect over 150,000 children born in the US this year, ensuring their constitutional birthright citizenship [7] Immigration Raids & Conditions - Several groups, including the city of Los Angeles, are suing the Trump administration over immigration raids [2] - Individuals are reportedly being racially profiled and swept up in immigration raids, with constitutional rights being violated [16][17] - Detainees are allegedly held in deplorable conditions, with limited access to water and counsel [18][19] - Lawyers have faced force, including tear gas, while trying to protect people's rights [19] Potential Consequences & Concerns - There are concerns about potential chaos and a humanitarian crisis if 28 states start revoking birthright citizenship [11] - The question of what happens to stateless individuals, particularly those who cannot be repatriated, is raised [12] - Concerns are expressed about the dehumanization of people and the potential for the administration to deprive people of their citizenship [14] - Comparisons are being made between ICE force and vigilantes or Gestapo due to perceived impunity [23]

[Music] We are following this breaking news impacting President Trump's immigration policy. In just the last hour here in New Hampshire, a federal judge issued a nationwide block against the president's order to end birthright citizenship. So that judge granted the plaintiff's bid for class action status, but ruled that the protected class does not include the parents of the children whose citizenship would be threatened.Last month, the Supreme Court limited the power of lower courts to issue nationwide inj ...

the disastrous decision by the Supreme Court four days ago that allows the Trump administration to begin implementing a flatly odious and unconstitutional order on birthright citizenship. Well, today the administration announced it will begin deporting people subject to that order as soon as July 27th. It's it's madness, but it is madness with a method, which is to deconstruct the foundational concept of what it is to be an American.A concept created in this country's second founding by the 14th Amendment, ...

Legal & Policy Implications - The Supreme Court ruling limits nationwide injunctions, leading to potential inconsistencies in the enforcement of immigration policies across different states [1][2] - This ruling indirectly impacts tech companies, as the citizenship status of their employees' children may vary depending on the state where the employee resides or sues [2][4] - A decision regarding the constitutionality of the birthright citizenship executive order is expected in October, which could further influence the legal landscape [4][6] Impact on Tech Companies & Employees - Tech companies may face new employee questions and policy considerations related to relocation and potential accommodations for employees concerned about their child's citizenship [3][14][15] - The perception of instability in the U S immigration system could deter high-skilled immigrants from accepting job offers from U S companies, potentially leading to a loss of talent and innovation [10] - Tech companies heavily rely on H-1B visas to hire skilled immigrants, which is crucial for maintaining their competitiveness [8][9] Challenges & Considerations - Differing legal standards across states could create logistical, administrative, and bureaucratic challenges for both H-1B visa holders and the companies employing them [7][8] - Companies may need to address employee concerns about relocating to states where their child's citizenship might be questioned [14] - Companies will need to decide whether to offer accommodations or avoid the topic altogether, requiring new policy considerations [15]

Big news from the Supreme Court on birthright citizenship. It's a ton of legal discussion. But here's what you need to know. Two things. First, you should know it's not a decision on the merits of birthright citizenship under the 14th amendment, but it is a real restriction on the power of lower courts. And second, and relatedly, Justice Katanji Brown Jackson had strong words calling it quote anathema to the rule of law. Why? because in her reasoning, this decision effectively divides America into two zones ...

Supreme Court Ruling Impact - The Supreme Court ruled that federal judges can no longer issue nationwide injunctions blocking executive orders deemed unconstitutional [1] - This decision is seen as a victory for Trump, potentially expanding presidential power [1] - The ruling limits the ability of lower courts to check aggressive executive branch actions [2] Legal Analysis - One perspective suggests the reaction to the ruling is an overreaction, arguing nationwide injunction cases are relatively recent [3][4] - An alternative vehicle, rule 23b2 of the federal rules of civil procedure, allows class actions against illegalities affecting many people [5] - It's predicted that nationwide class actions will be certified quickly, potentially negating the impact of the Supreme Court ruling [6] - Concerns exist that class actions are more complicated and may require more effort and cost for individuals to redress grievances [7] Potential Consequences - President Trump believes the decision allows him to proceed with numerous policies, including ending birthright citizenship and sanctuary city funding [10][11] - There are concerns that the ruling could hinder the immediate halting of executive actions causing irreparable harm [12] - Certifying class actions takes time, potentially delaying responses to future unconstitutional actions by the executive branch [13][14]