Core Viewpoint - Allegations have emerged that Meta systematically suppressed internal research regarding child safety risks associated with its virtual reality platforms, as testified by former employees in a Senate hearing [3][4][5]. Group 1: Allegations of Suppression - Former Meta researchers claimed that the company deployed legal teams to screen and edit sensitive safety research, aiming to create "plausible deniability" regarding the negative impacts of its VR products on young users [4][6]. - Internal documents indicated that after a whistleblower leaked information about Meta's policies, the company imposed new rules on research concerning sensitive topics, including children, which restricted the language researchers could use [6][7]. Group 2: Child Safety Concerns - Employees warned that children under 13 were bypassing age restrictions to access Meta's VR services, with estimates suggesting that 80% to 90% of users in some virtual rooms were underage [7]. - Former researcher Cayce Savage highlighted that Meta was aware of the presence of underage children on its VR platform but chose to ignore this issue [5]. Group 3: Meta's Response - Meta has denied the allegations, describing them as a "predetermined and false narrative" and asserting that the company has implemented various safety measures for young users [8]. - Researcher Jason Sattizahn stated that Meta has shown an inability to change its practices without external pressure from Congress, criticizing the company's prioritization of engagement and profits over safety [9].