Workflow
Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP)
icon
Search documents
NCLT orders liquidation of Hero Electric Vehicles after creditors reject resolution plans
ETAuto.com· 2026-03-13 06:21
Core Insights - The National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) ordered the immediate liquidation of Hero Electric Vehicles Pvt Ltd due to the failure to secure the required 66 percent approval from the Committee of Creditors (CoC) during the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) [8][10] - The liquidation order was issued on 3 March 2026, following the expiry of the CIRP on 13 February 2026, after multiple attempts to revive the company failed [8][10] - The case highlights significant challenges in India's electric two-wheeler sector, including over-leverage, subsidy delays, and battery supply issues, which are critical to achieving India's 2030 electrification goals [7][10] Company Overview - Hero Electric Vehicles Pvt Ltd entered the CIRP on 20 December 2024, initiated by an operational creditor, Metro Tyres Ltd, under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) [8] - The reconstituted CoC included key lenders such as Bank of Baroda with a secured claim of ₹55.35 crore (39.70 percent voting share), South Indian Bank with ₹17.62 crore (12.64 percent), and IDFC First Bank with a 6.76 percent share [8][10] Resolution Attempts - Over 16 CoC meetings were held, during which the Resolution Professional (RP) conducted two rounds of Expressions of Interest and received multiple resolution plans, but none secured the necessary creditor approval [2][8] - Initial plans were proposed in May 2025, but the CoC annulled the process and sought extensions, leading to further viable plans by August 2025, which also failed to gain approval [3][8] Liquidation Process - NCLT appointed Lekhraj Bajaj as Liquidator, transferring all records and relieving the previous RP, with a fresh moratorium under Section 33(5) barring suits against the estate [5][10] - The Liquidator is required to issue a 75-day preliminary report and investigate affairs under Section 35(1), while fees will follow IBBI scales prioritizing the liquidation estate [6][10] Industry Implications - The liquidation of Hero Electric Vehicles Pvt Ltd is part of a broader trend of insolvencies in the electric vehicle sector, raising concerns about the sustainability of companies in this market [7][10] - Stakeholders are closely monitoring whether the liquidation process will yield fair value or simply accelerate consolidation within the industry [7][10]
Vedanta seeks CCI nod to acquire debt-laden Jaiprakash Associates
The Economic Times· 2025-09-13 11:29
Core Viewpoint - Vedanta has emerged as the highest bidder to acquire Jaiprakash Associates Limited (JAL) under the corporate insolvency resolution process (CIRP), with a net present deal value of Rs 12,505 crore, surpassing the offer from Adani Group [1][7]. Group 1: Acquisition Details - Vedanta's proposed acquisition involves an upfront payment of Rs 3,800 crore and annual payments of Rs 2,500-3,000 crore over the next five years, potentially bringing the total acquisition cost to approximately Rs 17,000 crore [5][7]. - The financial creditors, forming the committee of creditors (CoC), have claimed unpaid dues amounting to Rs 57,185 crore, with the National Asset Reconstruction Company being the leading claimant after acquiring JAL's stressed loans from a consortium of lenders [5][7]. Group 2: Regulatory and Market Context - The Competition Commission of India (CCI) must approve Vedanta's acquisition proposal before the resolution plans can be sanctioned by the CoC [1][7]. - In a filing dated September 11, Vedanta stated that the proposed transaction is not expected to have any appreciable adverse effect on competition in India [7]. - The National Company Law Tribunal initiated insolvency proceedings against JAL in June of the previous year [2][7]. Group 3: Company Profile - JAL is an infrastructure and industrial company engaged in various sectors, including real estate, cement, hospitality, engineering, procurement, and construction contracting, with some group companies also involved in power, fertilizer, sports, and aviation [5][7]. Group 4: Credit Assessment - CreditSights, a Fitch Group firm, indicated that Vedanta's acquisition of JAL is credit negative due to a lack of strategic synergistic rationale [6][7].