I think it’s exactly that…These are OG cypherpunks that believed in anonymous, peer to peer exchange of capitalThe original thesis for bitcoin itself.IMO that entire thesis is gone now that big banks, public companies, and ETFs are the heavy buyers of this asset.It’s not the same message, it’s not the same idea, and to many of them, it’s past what it was originally presented as.Not saying that’s a bad thing just saying what the original white paper was vs what it is playing out as, it’s slowly becoming the ...

Core Insights - The article discusses the mystery surrounding the identity of Satoshi Nakamoto, the creator of Bitcoin, and the evolution of Bitcoin from its inception to its current state [3][4][6]. Group 1: Bitcoin's Origins and Ideals - Bitcoin was introduced in 2008 through a white paper that combined proof-of-work mechanisms, public-key cryptography, and peer-to-peer network architecture to create a decentralized digital currency [1]. - The concept of Bitcoin emerged from a group known as "Cypherpunks," which included both hippies and libertarians who were united by their discontent with the traditional financial system following the 2008 financial crisis [4][6]. Group 2: The Decline of Bitcoin's Ideals - Despite its initial promise, Bitcoin has devolved into a platform for speculation, fraud, money laundering, and black market transactions, undermining its original ideals of anonymity and decentralization [6]. - The failure of Bitcoin is attributed not to technical issues but to social problems, as idealists have fragmented into opposing factions, allowing opportunists to exploit the system [6]. Group 3: The Search for Satoshi Nakamoto - The book "The Mysterious Mr. Nakamoto" chronicles a 15-year quest to uncover Nakamoto's identity, highlighting the challenges faced in this pursuit [3][8]. - Various theories about Nakamoto's anonymity are explored, including the notion that his significant Bitcoin holdings may pose a risk of kidnapping, and the idea that a clear leader would contradict the decentralized nature of Bitcoin [6][8]. - The investigation ultimately fails to reveal Nakamoto's true identity, with attempts at stylometry leading to inconclusive results and a sense of an elusive mystery [6][8].