RT Matt Huang (@matthuang)On Tempo, permissionlessness, L1 vs L2Tempo will be a permissionless chain. On day 1, anyone will be able to deploy a token, and anyone will be able to transact on the chain. Some projects think that attracting real-world usage and serious institutions requires giving up on base layer neutrality. We do not think that, and that's not how we're building Tempo.The plan for Tempo is to have permissionless validation and permissionless smart contract deployment as well as permissionless ...

RT Matt Huang (@matthuang)On Tempo, permissionlessness, L1 vs L2Tempo will be a permissionless chain. On day 1, anyone will be able to deploy a token, and anyone will be able to transact on the chain. Some projects think that attracting real-world usage and serious institutions requires giving up on base layer neutrality. We do not think that, and that's not how we're building Tempo.The plan for Tempo is to have permissionless validation and permissionless smart contract deployment as well as permissionless ...

JUST IN:According to Matt Huang, Tempo chose to build a L1 instead of an Ethereum L2 because they think a "decentralized validator set is a necessary requirement for partners" to ensure credible neutrality.No mention of other economic reasons, or talk of a new token.Very, very interesting...Matt Huang (@matthuang):On Tempo, permissionlessness, L1 vs L2Tempo will be a permissionless chain. On day 1, anyone will be able to deploy a token, and anyone will be able to transact on the chain. Some projects think t ...