Britain’s Online Safety Act has provoked intense debate about how to reduce harm while protecting privacy and free expression. Yet its effects so far have been mild https://t.co/ka7jEPiWsJ ...

Jokesters lead the fight for free expression in India https://t.co/1zyQXhljXf ...

freedom of the press, free speech, free expression, which encompasses all of them. They're core and central to what we do at USC and what we do certainly at USC Anenburgg where we teach journalism, public relations, communication, and public diplomacy. And related to that is academic freedom, right, which is the freedom to teach uh research and study um free from interference.And my day job is to protect all of those things for our students and and for our faculty. We're not an ivory tower institution. We'r ...

Core Points - YouTube will allow previously banned accounts to apply for reinstatement, reversing a policy that treated violations as permanent [1][2] - The reinstatement applies to channels removed for posting Covid-19 or election-related misinformation [1][2] - This change follows pressure from Republican lawmakers to alter Biden-era speech policies regarding misinformation [4] Group 1: Policy Changes - YouTube's Community Guidelines now permit a broader range of content related to Covid and election integrity [2] - The reinstatement program will be a limited pilot project for a subset of creators and channels terminated under retired policies [2] - YouTube ended its standalone Covid misinformation rules in December 2024 [5] Group 2: Political Context - The move comes amid increasing Republican pressure on tech companies to reverse policies on vaccine and political misinformation [4] - In March, Rep. Jim Jordan subpoenaed Alphabet CEO Sundar Pichai, accusing YouTube of participating in a censorship regime [4] - Senior Biden administration officials had previously pressured YouTube to remove certain Covid-related videos that did not violate its policies [5] Group 3: Content Moderation - YouTube will not empower third-party fact-checkers for content moderation, emphasizing free expression on the platform [6] - The platform has produced programs to label context on videos, although it has not used fact-checkers [6] - YouTube features information panels with links to independent fact checks under videos to provide additional context [7]

Core Points - Disney announced that "Jimmy Kimmel Live!" will resume airing after a brief suspension due to controversial comments made by Kimmel, which were deemed insensitive at a sensitive time for the country [2][3] - The suspension of Kimmel became a significant cultural issue, attracting criticism from various sectors, including Hollywood and free speech advocates, highlighting the complexities of the broadcast TV industry [3][11] - The controversy was sparked by comments made by FCC chair Brendan Carr regarding Kimmel's remarks about the death of Charlie Kirk, which led to pressure from major companies like Sinclair and Nexstar [4][6] Company Actions - ABC, owned by Disney, initially suspended Kimmel's show to mitigate tensions following the controversial comments, but after discussions with Kimmel, decided to resume the show [3][2] - Sinclair and Nexstar exerted pressure on ABC to take action against Kimmel, with Sinclair demanding an apology and a donation to Kirk's family and Turning Point USA [10][6] - The situation has implications for Nexstar, which is seeking FCC approval for a $6.2 billion merger and thus faced heightened stakes in the controversy [6] Industry Reactions - The suspension of Kimmel drew backlash from notable figures, including former President Barack Obama and late-night hosts like Stephen Colbert and Seth Meyers, who emphasized the importance of free speech [11][12] - A protest occurred outside Walt Disney Studios in response to Kimmel's suspension, indicating significant public sentiment against the decision [11]

I just finished my second year and I'm the third longest serving Ivy president right now. Um, >> just a side note, >> there's been a bit of turnover a little bit. >> So, tell us like did you watch the Claudine Gay testimony and what did you think when you were watching that train wreck happen.>> Yeah. What was going on in the group chat >> while it was hurdling in the Ivy group chat. >> Ivy group was hurdling brick wall.Look, I mean, I think we have a responsibility to be different kinds of campuses and the ...

Free Speech Advocacy - The report highlights Charlie Kirk's advocacy for open debate and the opposition he faced from those against truth [1] - The report emphasizes the importance of defending free expression, stating that its loss leads to the loss of other freedoms [1] Societal Impact - The report suggests that free expression is under attack globally [1] - The report calls for the continuation of Charlie Kirk's mission to defend free speech [1]

Core Viewpoint - The House Judiciary Committee has subpoenaed Alphabet to obtain communications regarding content moderation policies with the Biden administration, focusing on conservative topics and potential censorship [1][2][4]. Group 1: Subpoena Details - The subpoena specifically requests communications about content limits or bans related to President Trump, Elon Musk, COVID-19, and other conservative discussions [2]. - Chairman Jim Jordan has expressed concerns that Alphabet has not publicly disavowed the Biden administration's alleged attempts to censor speech [4][6]. Group 2: Context and Reactions - The Trump administration and Republican lawmakers have criticized Big Tech for policies perceived to suppress conservative viewpoints online [3][6]. - Meta Platforms previously indicated that the Biden administration pressured them to censor content, leading to a reduction in content moderation practices [4].