There's a good chance that many of you watching right now have a dog somewhere nearby. But what do you actually know about where dogs come from. You're probably aware they evolved from wolves, but how and when.It turns out much of that is still a mystery. There are some intriguing clues, however, that have been discovered in the DNA of dogs and wolves. Clues that just might give us a better understanding of how they and we evolved.You've heard of survival of the fittest, but a scientist at Duke University s ...

RT Nick Szabo (@NickSzabo4)The spread of steppe herder genes into western Europe happened over 4,000 years ago, with no mass migration between then and the 20th century. In other words, relatively very stable for 4,000 years.In particular, the genetics of the Anglo-Saxons and the Normans were very similar to that of the Celts -- a steppe/EEF mix of practically the same proportions. So the genetic change they brought to the British Isles was extremely small compared to the mass migrations of the 20th and 21s ...

New research suggests genetics play a far larger role in longevity than previously believed — without diminishing the value of healthy habits, writes @fayeflam (via @opinion) https://t.co/YC3A895Mxn ...

RT Jared Taylor (@RealJarTaylor)Charles Murray has always taken a rigorously scientific stand on the genetic contribution to group differences in average IQ.Here, with a remarkable lack of bitterness, he points out how unusual this is.Future generations will surely marvel that we tried to run a multi-racial nation while remaining deliberately blind to race and IQ. ...

Scientists have identified 22 genes that increase the risk of conditions like lupus, stroke, and rheumatoid arthritis in patients who’ve caught the virus behind mono https://t.co/ffghmGburN ...

Research Focus - Genetics research offers clues to autism's biological mechanisms [1] - Research aids in identifying individuals with autism [1]

Historical Population Genetics - Major genetic mixing event in Europe occurred approximately 5,500 years ago [1] - Anatolian farmers mixed with Indo-European pastoralists [1] - This mixing formed the historical European population [1]

Historical Genetics and Linguistics - The document addresses a misleading suggestion regarding the ancestry of historical Scandinavians and Finns, clarifying they are not primarily descended from 10,000–11,000 BCE hunter-gatherers [1] - The analysis emphasizes that Scandinavians are closely related to other historical Europeans in both genetics and language, particularly other northern Europeans [1] - The report highlights the shared central Eurasian pastoral origin of Indo-European languages (including Latin, Greek, and Germanic) and Finno-Ugric languages (including Finnish) [1] - The study indicates that the genetic contribution of the 10,000–11,000 BCE hunter-gatherers to modern Europeans is minimal due to migrations of Anatolian farmers and Indo-European pastoralists [1] Research Context - The document references DNA and related studies conducted over the last several decades, acknowledging that further research is needed to fill in the details [1]

Historical Demographics and Genetics - Historical Scandinavians and Finns are largely not descended from 10,000-11,000 BCE hunter-gatherers [1] - Scandinavians are closely related in genetics and language to other historical Europeans, especially other northern Europeans [1] - European peoples share a central Eurasian pastoral origin in genetics and language with Indo-European language speakers [2] - Few genes from the 10,000-11,000 BCE hunter-gatherers remain in Europeans after the Anatolian farmer and Indo-European pastoralist migrations [2] Linguistic Evolution - Latin, ancient Greek, Germanic, Slavic, and other Indo-European languages share a common origin [2] - The 10,000-11,000 BCE hunter-gatherers could not have spoken an Indo-European language [2] Research and Documentation - DNA and related studies over the last several decades document these findings [3] - There is still room to fill in the details through further research [3]

Main Argument - The author believes James Watson's reputation as a great biologist will be restored in the future [4] - The author suggests Watson's candid assessment of the evidence regarding the Black/White (B/W) difference in IQ led to the devastation of his career and reputation [2] Supporting Points - Watson's conclusion that genetics played a role in IQ differences was shared by many specialists [2] - Watson expressed a desire to live long enough to see his remarks vindicated [3] - Genetic evidence from GWAS studies has found ubiquitous population differences across all races, including variants associated with cognition [3] - Evolutionary change has occurred after the dispersal from Africa, mostly locally [3]