Core Insights - Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) and iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF (IXUS) are two major international ETFs aimed at providing global diversification for investors [1] Cost & Size - VXUS has an expense ratio of 0.05% while IXUS has a slightly higher expense ratio of 0.07% [2] - As of February 7, 2026, VXUS reported a one-year return of 31.83% compared to IXUS's 31.67% [2] - VXUS has a dividend yield of 2.96%, slightly lower than IXUS's 3.01% [2] - VXUS has a total assets under management (AUM) of $133.1 billion, significantly larger than IXUS's $54.40 billion [2] Performance & Risk Comparison - Over the past five years, VXUS experienced a maximum drawdown of -29.43%, while IXUS had a slightly higher drawdown of -30.05% [4] - An investment of $1,000 in VXUS would have grown to $1,277 over five years, while the same investment in IXUS would have grown to $1,282 [4] Portfolio Composition - IXUS tracks an MSCI index and holds 4,211 securities, with major positions in Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing, Samsung Electronics, and ASML Holding [5] - VXUS holds 8,602 stocks, providing broader exposure compared to IXUS, while its top positions are similar to those of IXUS [6] Investor Considerations - Both ETFs exhibit similar characteristics in terms of holdings, Betas, dividend yields, and performance metrics, with the primary distinction being the number of holdings [7] - VXUS pays dividends quarterly, whereas IXUS pays semi-annually, which may influence investor preferences regarding dividend frequency [8]

Core Insights - Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) includes emerging markets, while iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF (IEFA) focuses solely on developed markets, offering a marginally higher yield and lower volatility [1][2] Cost & Size Comparison - VXUS has an expense ratio of 0.05% compared to IEFA's 0.07% - As of January 30, 2026, VXUS has a 1-year return of 29.5% and a dividend yield of 3.1%, while IEFA has a 1-year return of 26.6% and a dividend yield of 3.5% - VXUS has assets under management (AUM) of $573.7 billion, significantly higher than IEFA's $162.6 billion [3][4] Performance & Risk Comparison - Over the past five years, VXUS experienced a maximum drawdown of -29.43%, while IEFA had a drawdown of -30.41% - An investment of $1,000 would have grown to $1,297 in VXUS and $1,353 in IEFA over the same period [5] Fund Composition - IEFA holds 2,589 stocks from developed markets, with major sectors being financial services (22%), industrials (20%), and healthcare (11%), featuring top positions like ASML, Roche, and HSBC [6] - VXUS contains over 8,600 stocks from both developed and emerging markets, with significant exposure to financial services, industrials, and technology, including major positions like Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing, Tencent, and ASML [7][9] Market Performance Context - International stocks surged over 30% in 2025, significantly outperforming U.S. markets, driven by a weaker dollar and attractive valuations abroad, with both VXUS and IEFA benefiting from these gains [8] - VXUS provides a broader investment scope, capturing both developed and emerging markets, while IEFA selectively focuses on developed markets, trading off higher growth potential for reduced risk [10]

Key Takeaways Singapore offers stability and growth, making it a strong Asia allocation choice.STI rose 22% in 2025, up 5.7% this year, highlighting strong momentum.ETFs like EWS and ASEA give investors exposure to Singapore.A persistently fragile and unstable geopolitical landscape, marked by recurring trade tensions due to an unpredictable U.S. tariff policy and rising military and geopolitical flashpoints, has increased uncertainty around U.S. markets and pushed investors to seek broader global diversifi ...

What happened According to a Jan. 15, 2026, SEC filing, DiNuzzo Private Wealth, Inc. added 62,255 shares of Dimensional Global Core Plus Fixed Income ETF (NASDAQ:DFGP). The estimated value of the trade, based on the average share price over the quarter, was $3.43 million. The fund’s quarter-end position value increased by $3.06 million, a figure that includes both trading and market price movement effects. What else to know Buy activity brings the DFGP stake to 2.57% of DiNuzzo Private Wealth’s $919.22 ...

Core Insights - The article compares two international ETFs: Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO) and iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF (ACWX), highlighting their differing focuses on emerging markets versus a broader global diversification strategy [2] Cost and Size Comparison - VWO has a significantly lower expense ratio of 0.07% compared to ACWX's 0.32% [3][4] - As of January 25, 2026, VWO's one-year return is 28.53%, while ACWX's is 31.86% [3] - Both ETFs offer similar dividend yields, with VWO at 2.64% and ACWX at 2.7% [3] - VWO has assets under management (AUM) of $112.62 billion, significantly larger than ACWX's $8.53 billion [3] Performance and Risk Comparison - Over the past five years, VWO experienced a maximum drawdown of -34.31%, while ACWX had a drawdown of -30.06% [5] - An investment of $1,000 in VWO would have grown to $1,069 over five years, compared to $1,267 for ACWX [5] Portfolio Composition - ACWX, launched nearly 18 years ago, holds 1,796 companies across developed and emerging markets, with a focus on financial services, industrials, and technology [6] - The largest positions in ACWX include Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Tencent Holdings Ltd., and ASML Holding N.V. [6] - VWO is concentrated in emerging markets, with significant investments in technology, financial services, and consumer cyclical sectors, including major stakes in Taiwan Semiconductor, Tencent, and Alibaba Group [7] - TSMC alone constitutes over 10% of VWO's assets, indicating a higher concentration and potential volatility compared to ACWX [7] Dividend Payment Structure - ACWX pays dividends semi-annually, while VWO pays dividends quarterly, which may influence investor preferences regarding cash flow [10]

Core Insights - The Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF (VDC) is U.S.-focused with lower costs and larger assets under management, while the iShares Global Consumer Staples ETF (KXI) offers global diversification with a higher fee and slightly higher yield [1][2] Cost and Size Comparison - VDC has an expense ratio of 0.09% and assets under management (AUM) of $8.5 billion, while KXI has an expense ratio of 0.39% and AUM of $884.8 million [3][4] - The one-year return for VDC is 9.0%, compared to KXI's 14.8%, and both have a similar dividend yield, with VDC at 2.26% and KXI at 2.30% [3][4] Performance and Risk Analysis - Over the past five years, VDC has a maximum drawdown of 16.55%, while KXI has a drawdown of 17.43% [5] - A $1,000 investment in VDC would have grown to $1,481 over five years, compared to $1,322 for KXI [5] Portfolio Composition - KXI invests in 96 companies, with 97% in consumer defensive stocks and 3% in consumer cyclical stocks, including major holdings like Walmart and Costco [6] - VDC is heavily U.S.-centric, with 98% in consumer defensive stocks, and its largest positions include Walmart, Costco, and Procter & Gamble [7] Investment Implications - VDC has generated annualized total returns of 9.5% since 2006, outperforming KXI's 7.6%, despite both funds having similar top holdings [8] - KXI offers more international exposure, with only 60% of its holdings in U.S. stocks, while VDC's core holdings are primarily U.S.-based but generate significant overseas sales [10] - The lower expense ratio of VDC makes it a more attractive option for cost-conscious investors, especially given its long-term outperformance [11]

Core Insights - The article compares two ETFs in the consumer staples sector: State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLP) and iShares Global Consumer Staples ETF (KXI), highlighting their differences in focus, cost, performance, and holdings [1][5]. Group 1: ETF Overview - XLP consists of 36 U.S. consumer defensive stocks, including major companies like Walmart, Costco, and Procter & Gamble, providing targeted exposure to established U.S. staples [2]. - KXI, with a portfolio of 96 companies, offers global exposure, with 59% in U.S. stocks, 29% in European stocks, and 7% in Asian stocks, featuring both U.S. giants and international leaders like Nestle and Unilever [3][7]. Group 2: Performance and Fees - XLP has a lower expense ratio of 0.08% and a higher dividend yield of 2.7%, compared to KXI's expense ratio of 0.39% and dividend yield of 2.3%, making it more appealing for income-focused investors [4][8]. - Over the last five years, XLP generated a total return of 36.2% (CAGR of 6.4%), outperforming KXI, which had a total return of 28.1% (CAGR of 5.1%), although both funds lagged behind the S&P 500's CAGR of 14.6% [8]. Group 3: Investment Considerations - XLP is recommended for investors seeking exposure to the U.S. consumer staples market due to its better performance, yield, and fees, while KXI offers regional diversification as its main advantage [9].

I'm not saying I'm expecting a crash to the same degree as what we saw more than a quarter century ago. But what I am saying is that market participants may become more discriminating with their investment choices, and those companies in the AI space that are the most efficient could see the greatest gains. In other words, I think being a stock picker could be a good thing in 2026.That said, it will be interesting to see if 2026 bring sabot uncertainty around how easy the gains from AI exposure will be. The ...

Silver ETFs - Silver ETFs gained attention in 2025 due to significant price increases in India, driven by local shortages that inflated prices above global benchmarks [1][2] - The supply deficit in the physical silver market is expected to persist, potentially impacting new investments in Silver ETFs [1] - The strong performance of silver is attributed to its dual role as a precious metal and an industrial commodity, with high industrial demand contributing to price increases [2] Gold ETFs - Gold ETFs reached new all-time highs in 2025, with returns up to 78.76%, led by Axis Gold ETF [5] - Investors turned to gold as a hedge against uncertainty and equity volatility, appreciating the liquidity and transparency of gold ETFs [4] - The outlook for gold in 2026 is influenced by real yields, the US dollar, and central bank demand, with forecasts suggesting prices could stabilize around $4,500–$5,000 [6] Consumption Funds - Consumption funds attracted interest following the restructuring of the goods and services tax (GST) in September 2025, which aimed to improve household disposable incomes [7][8] - Despite the potential for recovery, consumption funds have faced losses since the implementation of GST 2.0, with significant declines observed in specific funds [9] - A gradual recovery in consumption growth is anticipated in 2026, driven by improved consumer confidence and discretionary spending [10] International Funds - International funds outperformed domestic funds in 2025, with average returns of 27.06%, bolstered by the depreciation of the Indian rupee [11][12] - Notable performances included the NASDAQ 100 and S&P 500, which delivered returns of 23.18% and 20.60%, respectively [12][23] - The recommendation for investors is to allocate 10–20% to international funds, focusing primarily on US markets [14] Auto Sector Funds - Auto sector funds experienced significant growth in 2025, supported by strong domestic consumption and lower input costs [15] - Average returns for auto sector funds were 17.15% in the current calendar year, although future performance may be more selective due to higher valuations [16][17] - The sector is expected to be suitable for tactical allocations rather than core holdings in 2026 [17] Technology Sector Funds - Technology sector funds were among the worst performers in 2025, with the Nifty IT index declining by 9% year-to-date [18][20] - Factors impacting performance included delayed tech projects due to macroeconomic uncertainties and policy issues, leading to a negative average return of 3.10% for tech funds [19][20] - There is cautious optimism for a rebound in the tech sector as demand improves and AI opportunities become clearer, although recovery is expected to be gradual [21][22]

Core Insights - The Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) includes both U.S. and international equities, while the Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) focuses solely on non-U.S. stocks, leading to differences in returns, yield, and sector exposure [1][2]. Cost & Size Comparison - VT has an expense ratio of 0.06% and a 1-year return of 15.2% with a dividend yield of 1.7% [3] - VXUS has a slightly lower expense ratio of 0.05% and a higher 1-year return of 22.7% with a dividend yield of 2.7% [3][4]. Performance & Risk Metrics - Over the past five years, VT experienced a maximum drawdown of 26.38%, while VXUS had a higher drawdown of 29.44% [5]. - An investment of $1,000 in VT would have grown to $1,520, compared to $1,247 for VXUS over the same period [5]. Portfolio Composition - VXUS provides exposure to 8,663 international stocks, with top holdings including Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing, Tencent, and ASML [6]. - VT encompasses 9,957 stocks, with major positions in Nvidia, Apple, and Microsoft, reflecting significant U.S. tech sector representation [7][10]. Investment Implications - The choice between VT and VXUS depends on the investor's desire for U.S. exposure in their global holdings, with VT being suitable for comprehensive global exposure and VXUS for adding international diversification to existing U.S. investments [8][11].