Leaning on a 'Yes' Heavy Side for this one tomorrow.Market is brand new at the time of writing this, so Volume is non-existent.YOU HAVE TO USE LIMIT ORDERS or you'll get rinsed.• China 3+ Times | YES• Taiwan | YES• Pacific | YES• AUKUS | YESReason being is simple, the topics of discussion are public, if you spend a couple minutes going to look for themAlso, it is ALL events the two are both present at, and including Q&A so there are AMPLE opportunities to hit the YES side on many of these, which is why i am ...

US-Australia Relations & Strategic Alignment - The US-Australia alliance is considered vital by both nations, despite the absence of a meeting between President Trump and Anthony Albanese [4] - The relationship is too significant to fail, prompting discussions on friction points like tariffs and defense spending [5][6] - A non-public review of AUKUS (orcas) has been conducted by Australia, aligning with strategic objectives to enhance submarine capabilities and counter China's assertiveness [15][16] - The US may be leveraging AUKUS to encourage increased Australian defense expenditure [17] Trade & Security Concerns - Trade tensions and tariff uncertainties complicate strategic directives aimed at China [1][2] - Critical minerals cooperation is increasingly important for both security and trade, especially as China weaponizes access to rare earth minerals [6][7][8] - Australia and the US signed an agreement ~18 months ago to expand collaboration on clean energy, climate change, and critical minerals [7] - Australia aims to ensure a trusted supply chain for the US and allies [8] Pacific Engagement & Regional Influence - The US has increased engagement with the Pacific, but development assistance is under review, raising concerns about episodic engagement [9][10][11] - Australia is the largest bilateral provider of aid to the Pacific, prompting discussions about whether it should increase its contribution if the US reduces its engagement [13][14]