RT Jeevs (@jeevsthecurious)Thank Core for allowing inscriptions. Now we have to fight to keep crap away in the network. The hardest asset tainted with scribbles and what not.Use the other "currencies", indeed! ...

RT Mechanic #FixTheFilters #300kb (@GrassFedBitcoin)Let's talk about filtering inscriptions.Because if it's possible - the main rationale for blowing out the OP RETURN limit to such an absurd degree no longer exists.It is achievable.28408 needs to be reopened and merged into Core.No one running a node wants to relay inscriptions.Give them tools to that effect, make them configurable and set a default policy that makes Bitcoin as a whole more conducive to monetary activity - not JPG storage.Controversy clear ...

RT Adam Back (@adam3us)You can send contiguous data in inscriptions too. Some wag found one of the image formats tolerates Taproot segment separators, they show as sparse red dots, but obviously a custom pallette can fix that. Also fwiw 1Mb contiguos data in op return have been consensus valid since 2014, people used transact them occasionally with miner help. There are 3.5m images some dating back a decade or more, a 2018 report saying there was illegal content before that.But this recent default change (j ...