Workflow
International Trade Negotiation
icon
Search documents
印度外长找补:还没定,协议必须对美印两国都有利
Sou Hu Cai Jing· 2025-05-20 09:50
Group 1 - The article discusses the contrasting responses of China and India to U.S. trade policies, highlighting China's successful negotiation for a 115% tariff reduction with the U.S. after a two-day meeting in Geneva [1][3] - India's recent actions, including a WTO complaint against U.S. tariffs and a proposal for zero tariffs on U.S. goods, reflect a shift in strategy influenced by China's perceived success [3][5] - The article critiques India's approach as reactive and lacking strategic depth, suggesting that India is imitating China's tactics without understanding the underlying strengths that enabled China's success [5][8] Group 2 - The article emphasizes that trade negotiations are not a zero-sum game, pointing out that China's strategy of expanding imports and upgrading industries has led to mutual benefits, while India's reliance on tariffs may harm its own economy [8] - It argues that geopolitical support cannot substitute for economic weaknesses, noting that U.S. investment in India is significantly lower than in China, indicating a need for India to strengthen its internal capabilities [8]