JHX Investors with Losses Encouraged to Contact FirmSAN FRANCISCO,Dec. 3, 2025/PRNewswire/ -- National shareholder rights law firm**Hagens Berman**reminds investors that the deadline to move the Court for appointment as lead plaintiff in the securities class action lawsuit against**James Hardie Industries plc (NYSE:[JHX](#financial-modal))**is**December 23, 2025**.The lawsuitallegesthat James Hardie and its executives misled investors by touting strong growth in its crucial**North America Fiber Cement**segm ...

Core Viewpoint - A class action lawsuit has been filed against James Hardie Industries plc for allegedly misleading investors about inventory destocking during a challenging market period [2][3]. Group 1: Allegations and Misleading Statements - Robbins LLP is investigating claims that James Hardie made false statements regarding the strength of its North America Fiber Cement segment, despite evidence of inventory destocking starting in April and May 2025 [2]. - The complaint alleges that James Hardie engaged in fraudulent channel stuffing, misrepresenting sales as being driven by sustainable customer demand [2]. Group 2: Impact on Stock Price - On August 19, 2025, James Hardie disclosed a 12% decline in sales for its North America Fiber Cement segment, which led to a significant drop in stock price by over 34%, from $28.43 to $18.64 per share [3]. Group 3: Class Action Participation - Shareholders interested in participating as lead plaintiffs in the class action must submit their papers by December 23, 2025, although participation is not required to be eligible for recovery [4].

Core Viewpoint - Celanese Corporation has faced significant stock price declines due to ongoing inventory destocking issues and disappointing financial results, leading to investigations regarding potential misleading disclosures to investors [1][2][4]. Financial Performance - On August 12, 2025, Celanese reported Q2 2025 financial results, resulting in a share price drop of $6.20 (-13%) due to ongoing inventory destocking problems [1]. - The company reported a 54% decline in net cash provided by operations for the nine months ending September 30, 2024, compared to the same period in 2023, attributing this to inventory increases and timing of collections [4]. - Subsequent quarterly reports in February, May, and August 2025 continued to show disappointing results, with the company citing severe destocking issues, particularly in the automotive sector [5]. Investigations and Legal Actions - Hagens Berman, a national shareholders rights firm, has initiated an investigation into whether Celanese misled investors regarding its sales practices and growth prospects, particularly in the Engineered Materials segment [2][3]. - The investigation is focused on the propriety of Celanese's disclosures about its sales practices, inventory reporting, and growth trajectory [3][6]. - The firm encourages investors who have suffered losses or possess relevant information to come forward [6].

Group 1 - The commercial OE business of Howmet experienced low single-digit growth despite inventory destocking trends seen in many suppliers [1] - Boeing has been attempting to slim down its balance sheet, which has led to a buildup of parts due to lower production rates [2] - The actions taken by Howmet over the past year have contributed to its ability to maintain growth amidst industry challenges [1][2]

Financial Performance - The Company's adjusted EBITDA nearly doubled compared to the year-ago period[4] - Gross profit margin reached its highest level in five quarters[5], increasing from 29% to 31%[7, 14] - Q2 2025 EBITDA increased to $11 million from $6 million in Q2 2024[7] - The Company maintains 2025 EBITDA guidance of $40 million to $44 million and revenue guidance of $535 million - $545 million[6] Revenue Analysis - Total Net Sales increased by 1% from $128.209 million in Q2 2024 to $129.313 million in Q2 2025[10] - U S Crop revenue increased by 1% from $52.289 million to $52.674 million[10] - U S Non-Crop revenue increased by 2% from $19.011 million to $19.585 million[10] Operational Efficiency and Debt Reduction - Operating expenses decreased by 13% year-over-year[17] - The company's revolving line of credit decreased from $211 million to $190 million year-over-year[19]