.@CFTC Reaffirms Exclusive Jurisdiction Over Prediction Markets in Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court Filing: https://t.co/BvFfG9y1hT ...

RT Reza Nasri (@RezaNasri1)The Department of War claims “International waters are not a refuge for sanctioned vessels.”This is nonsense.U.S. domestic law, including its sanctions, has no application in international waters. The high seas are not U.S. territory, so American rules do not extend there. The high seas belong to no state. They are "res communis", open to all nations with no sovereignty attached.These sanctions cannot be enforced against foreign vessels in international waters.The EU’s 1996 Blocki ...

.@CFTC Reaffirms Exclusive Jurisdiction Over Prediction Markets in U.S. Circuit Court Filing: https://t.co/8Ks0tSxsvL ...

NEW: CFTC chair Selig says the agency has exclusive authority over prediction markets and will defend its jurisdiction against state challenges. https://t.co/lOKfXA8tzw ...

RT Álvaro D. María (@Alvaro_DMaria)Now that @NickSzabo4 is back, I highly recommend reading his blog — it’s full of brilliant articles. The ones on jurisdiction are especially insightful. Check out Jurisdiction as Property and peer-to-peer government:https://t.co/XKTT6u90j9 ...

RT Global Government Affairs (@GlobalAffairs)Last week, a Brazilian judge from Blumenau, Santa Catarina, ruled that removing content deemed unlawful under Brazilian law is not enough if limited to Brazil. The judge is now demanding the global removal of online content under threat of hefty fines for the platform. These decisions are based on recent Superior Court of Justice (STJ) precedent.This means that even if the content is not unlawful in other countries, the Brazilian judiciary believes it has the pow ...