RT Nick Szabo (@NickSzabo4)The problem isn't so much responsibility, it's legal barriers preventing end users from effective use of the automation, usually via preventing effective supply of these needs, to artificially protect the supposedly "responsible" professionals. Recent changes to ChatGPT, Grok, etc. regarding legal advice and personalized education, and medical advice and personalized education, are a good case in point. These changes will deprive billions of people of effective, very-low-cost, at- ...

Hallucination & Deception Rate Analysis - GTP5 scored 50 in deception rate, while 03 scored 47.4%, but the bar chart visually misrepresented the data, making GTP5 appear better when it's actually worse [1] - The report lacks clarity on what constitutes a good deception rate, ideally aiming for zero, especially when the model is used for medical advice [2][3] - Chart inconsistencies include boxes of different sizes representing percentages that don't align with their visual representation, such as 69.1%, 30.8%, and 52% [2] Data Presentation Issues - The charts exhibit a lack of consistency, with the highest numbers not always positioned in the highest spot [1] - Random coloring and inconsistent sizing of elements within the charts further contribute to the confusion [2]