Core Viewpoint - The release of the "Self-Regulatory Guidelines for Bond Valuation Business in the Interbank Bond Market" aims to enhance the rationality, scientific nature, fairness, and transparency of the valuation of securitized products, thereby increasing market participation in these products [1][2]. Group 1: Importance of Valuation Guidelines - The guidelines address the need for fair, scientific, and stable valuation of various bond types, particularly securitized products, which have been increasingly significant in China's bond market [2][4]. - Securitized products are characterized by their complexity and lower liquidity, necessitating accurate cash flow predictions for proper valuation [2][6]. - The guidelines emphasize the importance of considering the credit status and type differences of underlying assets when setting valuation parameters [2][6]. Group 2: Transparency and Market Impact - Increased transparency in valuation will help users understand the valuation logic of institutions, allowing for better validation of results and enhancing overall valuation quality [3][4]. - Transparent valuation results can provide fair price references for secondary market transactions, reducing pricing discrepancies and improving market liquidity [3][5]. Group 3: Encouragement of Multiple Valuation Sources - The guidelines encourage users to select multiple valuation products for cross-validation, which helps mitigate risks associated with reliance on a single valuation source [3][5]. - The presence of multiple valuation institutions can enhance information dissemination in the market, leading to more efficient pricing and better investment decisions [4][5]. Group 4: Focus on Credit Risk - The core foundation of the credit bond valuation technical system is the dynamic assessment of credit risk, with rating agencies playing a crucial role in this process [6][7]. - The valuation of securitized products, especially subordinate securities, is significantly impacted by the credit risk of underlying assets, highlighting the need for accurate credit risk assessment [6][7]. Group 5: Future Outlook - Experts suggest that rating agencies can expand their role in the valuation field, leveraging their data reserves and credit risk analysis capabilities to provide diverse valuation references and mitigate financial market risks [7].