Next - generation computing
Search documents
MVST vs. Arm Holdings: Which Tech Growth Stock is the Better Placed?
ZACKSยท 2025-10-30 19:46
Core Insights - Microvast (MVST) and Arm Holdings (ARM) are key innovators in technology, focusing on high-growth areas such as battery systems and semiconductor architecture [1][2] - Both companies are strategically positioned in transformative themes like electrification, artificial intelligence, and next-generation computing [2][3] Microvast Overview - Microvast specializes in advanced lithium-ion battery systems, particularly its True All-Solid-State Battery (ASSB) technology, which enhances safety and efficiency by eliminating liquid electrolytes [4][5] - The company reported a 9.2% year-over-year revenue growth in Q2 2025, with a 220-basis-point improvement in gross margin [4] - Adjusted EBITDA surged to $25.9 million, a significant recovery from a negative $78.4 million in the same quarter last year [5] - The Huzhou Phase 3.2 expansion plan aims to increase production capacity by 2 GWh, enhancing market share and competitive strength [6] Arm Holdings Overview - ARM maintains dominance in mobile computing with power-efficient chip architectures that are integral to devices from major companies like Apple, Qualcomm, and Samsung [7][8] - The demand for ARM's chips is growing as they are essential for AI and IoT advancements, powering a wide range of applications from wearables to cloud infrastructure [8] - ARM's architecture is becoming increasingly vital in the AI-driven future, supporting innovations in machine learning and edge computing [8] Financial Estimates - Microvast's 2025 sales estimate is $462.3 million, indicating a 21.7% year-over-year growth, with earnings expected to surge over 100% from the previous year [11] - ARM's 2025 sales estimate is $4.7 billion, reflecting an 18.1% year-over-year growth, with earnings projected to increase by 1.2% [14] Valuation Comparison - Microvast is trading at a forward P/E ratio of 19.71X, below its 12-month median of 20.78X, while ARM is at 85.87X, lower than its median of 123.75X [17] - Both stocks are trading at discounts compared to historical valuations, but Microvast appears significantly cheaper than ARM [17] Conclusion - Microvast is better positioned for near-term growth due to advancements in ASSB technology, improving profitability, and attractive valuation [18] - ARM remains a dominant player in semiconductors, but its high valuation limits near-term upside potential [18]