Core Argument - The prevailing scientific approach, rooted in Galileo's separation of quantitative physical science from qualitative human consciousness, is inadequate for understanding consciousness [9][10][11] - Current science excels at describing the behavior of matter but fails to address its intrinsic nature, mirroring its inability to capture the qualities of conscious experience [15][16][19][20] - Pansychism, the view that all matter possesses some form of consciousness, offers a potential solution by proposing that the qualities of experience are the intrinsic nature of matter, complementing rather than contradicting scientific findings [21][23][24][25] Critique of Existing Theories - Dualism, the belief in a non-physical soul controlling the brain, is incompatible with neuroscience, which shows that all brain activity has physical causes within the brain [6][7][8] - A purely quantitative scientific approach, while valuable, inherently excludes the qualitative aspects of conscious experience, leading to an incomplete understanding [11][26] Pansychism as a Potential Solution - Pansychism suggests that even basic building blocks of matter like electrons and quarks may have incredibly simple forms of conscious experience [23] - Pansychism can accommodate both the qualitative story of human consciousness and the quantitative story of neuroscience [27] Implications and Future Directions - The industry is potentially on the verge of a paradigm shift, akin to the Copernican revolution, where the idea that human consciousness is cosmically special will be cast aside [30][31] - Pansychism offers a worldview where consciousness is not a unique miracle but a fundamental aspect of the universe, potentially resolving the mismatch between scientific theory and lived experience [31][34]