Core Viewpoint - Alpha Modus, Corp. has filed a patent infringement lawsuit against Inditex and Zara USA, claiming unauthorized use of its patented retail technologies [1][2] Group 1: Patent Infringement Details - The lawsuit asserts infringement of four U.S. patents related to real-time retail analytics, personalized shopper engagement, inventory intelligence, and automated in-store purchase technologies [1] - The complaint alleges that Zara's retail environment utilizes Alpha Modus's patented methods without authorization, including RFID garment tracking systems and digital surveillance technologies [2] Group 2: Technology Foundation - Alpha Modus emphasizes that its patented technologies were developed through extensive engineering and real-world testing in retail environments [3] - The company has a growing network of reseller and ecosystem partnerships that integrate its patented methods into retail infrastructure, showcasing active commercial implementations [4] Group 3: Importance of Enforcement - The technologies covered by the patents are essential for modern retail operations, including product-interaction analysis and automated checkout workflows [5] - Alpha Modus typically licenses its intellectual property and pursues enforcement actions only when unlicensed use provides competitive advantages to infringing parties [5] Group 4: Case Information - The lawsuit, titled Alpha Modus, Corp. v. Industria de Diseño Textil, S.A. & Zara USA, Inc., seeks monetary damages, enhanced damages for willful infringement, and injunctive relief [6][9] Group 5: Company Overview - Alpha Modus is a vertical AI company focused on real-time in-store shopper engagement, utilizing a patented "closed-loop" retail AI framework [7] - The company is actively deploying technologies that merge AI, retail media, and financial access across the retail landscape [7]

Core Points - A federal jury in California ruled that Apple must pay Masimo $634 million for infringing a patent related to blood oxygen monitoring technology [1] - Masimo expressed that this ruling is a significant win for protecting their innovations and intellectual property [2] - Apple plans to appeal the verdict, arguing that the patent in question expired in 2022 and pertains to outdated technology [2] - The legal dispute centers around pulse oximetry technology, with Masimo accusing Apple of hiring its employees and infringing on its patents [3] - The U.S. International Trade Commission previously sided with Masimo, banning Apple from importing Apple Watches with blood oxygen monitoring features [3] - Apple announced a new version of the blood oxygen feature that circumvents the ban by calculating readings on the paired iPhone instead of the Apple Watch [6] - Masimo is suing U.S. Customs and Border Patrol for allowing the import of Apple Watches with the new implementation [6] - Apple countersued Masimo and won a nominal payment of $250 for design patent violations [7]

Core Viewpoint - Alpha Modus, Corp. has filed a patent infringement lawsuit against AtliQ Technologies, asserting that AtliQ's AI-powered retail systems infringe on four U.S. patents related to Alpha Modus's technology [1][2]. Patent Infringement Details - The lawsuit claims infringement of U.S. patents Nos. 10,360,571, 10,977,672, 11,042,890, and 12,039,550, which are central to Alpha Modus's ecosystem [2]. - AtliQ's systems, including smart shelf management and retail analytics, utilize methods that are claimed to be patented by Alpha Modus [2]. Company Strategy - The company views patent enforcement as a means to accelerate its business rather than a distraction, aiming to protect its AI-retail workflow and convert infringers into partners [3]. - Alpha Modus has previously engaged in similar enforcement actions against other retail-tech vendors, seeking to standardize licensing for its core retail AI workflow [3]. Company Overview - Alpha Modus, Corp. is a vertical AI company focused on enhancing real-time shopper engagement in physical retail environments through its patented framework [4]. - The company is actively commercializing its technologies across the nation, including through its subsidiary, Alpha Modus Financial Services [4].

Nine-count complaint alleges fraud, false advertising, breach of contract, and patent infringement WESTMINSTER, CA / ACCESS Newswire / November 12, 2025 / BioLargo, Inc. (OTCQX:BLGO), a cleantech innovator that develops and commercializes sustainable technologies, announced today that it has filed a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California to protect its patented CupriDyne odor control technology and its related products, that built the Pooph pet-products brand. The suit (Un ...

Core Viewpoint - GoDaddy has been ordered to pay $170 million for patent infringement related to website-building technology, as determined by a Delaware federal jury [1][2]. Group 1: Legal Proceedings - A jury found that GoDaddy's web-design tools infringe on two patents owned by Express Mobile [1]. - GoDaddy plans to contest the verdict in district court and potentially on appeal [2]. - Express Mobile's attorney described the verdict as a significant affirmation of the value of their patents [2]. Group 2: Company Background - Express Mobile, based in Novato, California, holds patents in internet and mobile technology, developed by founder Steven Rempell, a former IBM engineer [2]. - GoDaddy, located in Tempe, Arizona, has previously denied similar allegations and argued the patents in question are invalid [3]. Group 3: Related Legal History - In 2023, GoDaddy won a separate jury trial concerning related infringement claims from Express Mobile [3]. - Express Mobile previously secured a $40 million verdict against Shopify in 2022, although that verdict was later overturned by a federal judge [3].

Core Viewpoint - Alpha Modus Holdings, Inc. has filed a federal patent-infringement lawsuit against Adroit Worldwide Media, Inc. for unauthorized use of its patented retail-intelligence and cashierless-checkout technologies [1][2]. Group 1: Patent Infringement Details - The lawsuit claims infringement of four U.S. patents related to real-time inventory management, personalized shopper engagement, and automated checkout experiences [2]. - Alpha Modus alleges that AWM's products, including AWM Frictionless and Smart Shelf, utilize its patented methods without authorization [2][3]. Group 2: Legal Actions and Objectives - The complaint seeks damages, enhanced penalties for willful infringement, and a permanent injunction against further violations by AWM [3]. - Alpha Modus emphasizes the importance of its intellectual property (IP) in the retail AI sector and aims to protect shareholder value through decisive legal actions [4]. Group 3: Strategic Enforcement - This lawsuit is part of a broader strategy by Alpha Modus to enforce its patents and strengthen its monetization pipeline [5]. - The company’s patent portfolio includes technologies that enhance in-store analytics and customer engagement, bridging online and offline retail experiences [4][6].

Financial Data and Key Metrics Changes - The company reported third-quarter revenue of $87.3 million, which was in line with expectations, and non-Pay TV recurring revenue increased by 31% year over year [5][12] - Adjusted EBITDA for the third quarter was $50.7 million, reflecting an adjusted EBITDA margin of 58% [19] - Operating expenses were $37.1 million, a decrease of $3.5 million, or 9% from the prior quarter [17][18] Business Line Data and Key Metrics Changes - Non-Pay TV recurring revenue was up 81% since the company's separation, driven by new agreements in semiconductors, OTT, social media, and e-commerce [12][16] - The company closed two long-term license agreements during the third quarter, including a renewal with Altice and a new agreement with an e-commerce customer [11][17] Market Data and Key Metrics Changes - The company has signed four e-commerce customers since entering the market last year, indicating growth in this vertical [11] - The semiconductor business saw an increase in recurring revenue, attributed to the 3D NAND opportunity [30] Company Strategy and Development Direction - The company is focused on expanding beyond its core Pay TV business into new growth opportunities in semiconductors, OTT, social media, and e-commerce [12][16] - The company aims to deliver sustainable, long-term revenue growth and has adjusted its 2025 revenue guidance to a range of $360-$380 million due to litigation against AMD [21][23] Management's Comments on Operating Environment and Future Outlook - Management expressed confidence in the strength of the patent portfolio and the value of innovations, particularly in light of ongoing litigation against AMD and Disney [9][10] - The company anticipates that opportunities not closed in 2025 will act as catalysts for growth in 2026 [22][23] Other Important Information - The company has paid down $312 million of its debt since separation and continues to focus on deleveraging its balance sheet [16][19] - The company has increased its patent portfolio from approximately 9,500 to over 13,000 patent assets, reflecting a growth of over 35% [13] Q&A Session Summary Question: Clarification on one-time catch-up fees and fourth-quarter revenue outlook - The recurring revenue in Q3 was modest at about $1 million, primarily from one new license agreement and one renewal [26] Question: Size and types of deals in the pipeline - The company expects recurring revenue to cross approximately $90 million in Q4, with strong foundations in both media and semiconductor sectors [27][28] Question: Timeline and milestones for AMD litigation - The company anticipates the AMD cases going to trial in 2027, with significant patents involved [30][31] Question: Implications of AMD litigation on other semiconductor deals - The company is excited about the adoption cycle of hybrid bonding and sees potential growth in the semiconductor pipeline [37] Question: Operating expenses in relation to expected revenue growth - The company plans to invest modestly in the business while maintaining a tight lid on spending [39]

Core Points - Apple has requested a judge to dismiss a racketeering lawsuit filed by Fintiv, which alleges that Apple stole technology to create Apple Pay and engaged in racketeering by generating fees for credit card issuers [1][2] - Fintiv claims that Apple posed as a potential partner to gain access to its mobile wallet technology, leading to the alleged theft of trade secrets and technology [4][5] Legal Proceedings - Apple argues that Fintiv delayed pursuing most of its claims and failed to demonstrate a pattern of racketeering [2] - If the case is not dismissed, Apple has requested that it be transferred to a Texas judge who is already familiar with a related patent case involving Fintiv [3] - Fintiv's previous patent case against Apple was dismissed on August 4, and Fintiv is currently appealing that decision [3][6] Background Information - Fintiv's predecessor, Mozido, established a phone-based payment remittance business with Western Union and RadioShack in 2008 [4] - The lawsuit filed by Fintiv in August accuses Apple of racketeering and theft of trade secrets related to the technology powering Apple Pay [4] - The complaint alleges that Apple engineers attended technical sessions under nondisclosure agreements and subsequently hired key personnel from Fintiv's predecessor, incorporating their technology into Apple Pay's launch in 2014 [5]

Core Points - ParkerVision, Inc. has received approval from the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit to expedite its appeal in the patent-infringement case against Qualcomm Incorporated and Qualcomm Atheros, Inc. [1] - The court has set specific deadlines for the submission of briefs: ParkerVision's opening brief is due by December 1, 2025, Qualcomm's response brief by January 16, 2026, and ParkerVision's reply brief by February 6, 2026 [1] - Oral arguments will be scheduled for the next available session after the completion of the briefing process [1]

Core Viewpoint - Alpha Modus, Corp. has filed a patent infringement lawsuit against Lowe's Companies, Inc. and Lowe's Home Centers, LLC, asserting six U.S. patents related to AI-driven retail technologies [1][3]. Patent Infringement Details - The lawsuit claims infringement of six patents covering technologies for real-time inventory management, customer assistance, personalized in-store advertising, dynamic store layout optimization, and behavioral data-driven retail engagement [3][5]. - The accused Lowe's systems include Dwell heat-mapping platform, Axis/Genetec camera network, Store Digital Twin, One Roof Media Network, Mylow Companion AI application, and Innovation Labs initiatives, which utilize real-time behavioral and visual analytics [4][6]. Technology Overview - The asserted patents protect methods for: - Using image recognition and behavioral data for dynamic inventory and pricing management [5]. - Delivering real-time personalized promotions based on shopper sentiment [5]. - Generating optimized store layouts from traffic and dwell-time analytics [5]. - Integrating AI-driven personalization engines linking in-store behavior with digital marketing [6]. Company Background - Alpha Modus Holdings, Inc. develops and licenses patented AI technologies that enhance physical retail performance through behavioral analytics and real-time computer vision [7].