Group 1 - The article presents a parable about a village with a unique rule regarding red-eyed individuals, illustrating how a new consensus can change perceptions and behaviors within a community [1][2][3] - The arrival of a monk who announces the existence of at least one red-eyed person triggers a chain reaction, leading to the eventual realization and departure of the red-eyed individuals based on their observations of each other [4][5][6] - The story emphasizes that the monk's declaration created a new consensus among the villagers, transforming an unspoken truth into a public acknowledgment, which led to inevitable consequences [8][9][10] Group 2 - The article draws parallels between the village's situation and the global order under "Pax Americana," where countries have cooperated under a shared understanding, benefiting from a stable system [11][12][13] - A shift occurs when a leader publicly expresses dissatisfaction with the existing global order, creating a new consensus that alters the dynamics of international relations from cooperation to competition [13][14][15] - The transition from a cooperative game to a competitive one signifies a fundamental change in global interactions, leading to a potential decline in overall growth and increased challenges in international cooperation [16][17][18] Group 3 - The article posits that once the global game shifts from coordination to competition, it becomes irreversible, as trust is difficult to rebuild once broken [18][19][20] - The future of global order is uncertain, with possibilities ranging from fragmented governance to a dual power structure, indicating a more challenging environment for cooperation [19][21][22] - The narrative concludes with a metaphorical reference to a new beginning, suggesting that the world is entering a complex and chaotic adaptation process, reminiscent of a pivotal moment in a story [22][24][25]