Core Viewpoint - A series of rulings from the Hamburg Regional Court has intensified the legal conflict between Ryanair and eDreams ODIGEO, with both parties leveraging court decisions to support their contrasting claims regarding pricing transparency and consumer protection [1] Group 1: Rulings Against eDreams ODIGEO - The Hamburg court ruled that eDreams misled consumers by not clearly disclosing its service fees alongside seat and baggage prices, labeling this practice as "misleading" [2] - The court found that eDreams' advertised savings under its Prime subscription "cannot actually be achieved" by consumers, further emphasizing the misleading nature of its pricing displays [2][3] Group 2: Rulings Against Ryanair - In a separate ruling, the Hamburg court fined Ryanair for breaching a court injunction from May 2025, citing "bad faith" non-compliance, indicating that Ryanair had the means to comply but chose not to [4] - The court declared several of Ryanair's practices unlawful, including its non-refundable policy, fees for processing government tax refunds, and a pre-ticked consent mechanism for terms and conditions [5] Group 3: Market Reaction - Following the court rulings, Ryanair shares experienced a slight increase of 0.26%, reaching $70.73 in premarket trading, approaching its 52-week high of $74.23 [6]

More pricing transparency in the UK veterinary industry is welcome, but don't expect lower pet-care bills, writes @chrismbryant (via @opinion) https://t.co/O8Nai4YgCo ...