蓝鲸新闻1月16日讯，近日，安徽证监局发布行政监管措施决定书，剑指合肥水木信保股权管理投资中心(有限合伙)。 决定书显示，合肥水木信保股权管理投资中心(有限合伙)在从事私募基金业务活动中，存在以下情形：一是未及时填报并更新管理人办公地址 及其从业人员的有关信息，且专职员工少于5人；二是未按规定履行信息披露义务；三是在管理、运用私募基金财产过程中，未勤勉谨慎履行 管理职责；四是未按规定开展投资者适当性管理工作。 以上行为违反了《私募投资基金监督管理暂行办法》《私募投资基金信息披露管理办法》《证券期货投资者适当性管理办法》 的规定。安徽 证监局决定对合肥水木信保股权管理投资中心(有限合伙)采取责令改正的行政监管措施，并记入证券期货市场诚信档案。 门口山江西自右垃女火云顶山门以久以中用(门以久以中月门休吧赵 邮政快递寄送至中国证券监督管理委员会法治司),也可以在收到本决定 书之日起6个月内向有管辖权的人民法院提起诉讼。复议与诉讼期间， 上述监督管理措施不停止执行。 安徽证监局 2026年1月9日 ...

Core Viewpoint - Shenzhen Jun Chuang Private Equity Fund Management Co., Ltd. and Shenzhen Qianhai Jun Chuang Asset Management Co., Ltd. have been issued warning letters by the Shenzhen Securities Regulatory Bureau due to regulatory violations in their private fund operations [2][3][4]. Group 1: Regulatory Violations - Jun Chuang Fund failed to properly file fund registration as required during its private fund business activities [4][6]. - Jun Chuang Asset Management exhibited multiple violations, including failing to fulfill due diligence obligations, inconsistencies between promotional materials and fund contracts, and not disclosing significant information affecting investors' rights [9]. - Zhu Feng, responsible for daily operations and information disclosure at Jun Chuang Asset Management, did not adhere to relevant conduct norms [9]. Group 2: Company Background - Jun Chuang Fund was established in 2014, registered with a capital of 30 million yuan, and manages between 2 billion to 5 billion yuan [11]. - The company focuses on sectors such as military-civilian integration, healthcare, cultural media, and intelligent manufacturing, with a management team from well-known financial institutions [12]. - Jun Chuang Asset Management was founded in 2015 with a registered capital of 10 million yuan and manages between 500 million to 1 billion yuan [12]. - Both companies have been previously named in regulatory actions, indicating a pattern of compliance issues [12].

Core Insights - The private equity industry is undergoing a significant regulatory tightening, leading to a substantial number of private institutions being deregistered, with nearly 100 institutions deregistered monthly since the beginning of 2025 [1][3] - As of May 28, 2025, a total of 500 private institutions have been deregistered, with 260 due to operational abnormalities, loss of contact, or disciplinary actions [1] - The number of active private fund managers continues to decline, with 19,891 remaining as of April 2025, a decrease of nearly 400 since the beginning of the year [1] Regulatory Actions - Recent reports from regulatory bodies in Beijing and Shenzhen have highlighted various violations by private funds, including improper fundraising and management practices [3] - Over 130 private institutions have faced administrative penalties or regulatory measures from the securities regulatory system since the start of 2025 [3] - A significant case involved Ping An Wealth, which was publicly reprimanded and faced a six-month suspension on product registration due to multiple violations [3] Compliance Requirements - The Beijing Securities Regulatory Bureau has mandated that private fund managers conduct self-assessments against regulatory requirements and rectify any identified violations [4] - Emphasis has been placed on enhancing knowledge of laws and regulations related to private funds and improving internal control management [4]