I‘m not a BTC maximalistI‘m not a ETH maximalistI‘m a profit maximalistWinning is the only option. ...

Core Viewpoint - The report titled "OpenAI Files" reveals a systematic and premeditated transformation of OpenAI from a non-profit research lab focused on human welfare to a profit-driven entity prioritizing investor returns, highlighting significant concerns regarding governance, CEO integrity, and organizational culture [2][4]. Group 1: Restructuring - OpenAI is dismantling its foundational ethical and structural pillars, transitioning from a mission-driven organization to one focused on maximizing profits for investors [4]. - The initial "Capped-Profit" model, designed to ensure wealth generated from AGI is shared with humanity, has been undermined by introducing clauses that effectively nullify this commitment, including a secret provision for a "20% automatic annual growth" [5]. - The organization's shift from a non-profit to a Public Benefit Corporation (PBC) has weakened its oversight mechanisms, changing its legal obligations from prioritizing mission to balancing shareholder interests with public benefits [5]. Group 2: CEO Integrity - CEO Sam Altman exhibits a pattern of behavior characterized by dishonesty, information manipulation, and prioritizing personal interests over organizational responsibilities [8]. - Instances of Altman misleading stakeholders include denying knowledge of a clause that deprived departing employees of equity, despite evidence showing he authorized it [9]. - Altman has concealed his personal ownership of the OpenAI startup fund from the board, raising questions about his transparency and accountability [11]. Group 3: Transparency and Safety - OpenAI's commitments to safety and transparency are systematically contradicted by its internal practices, with a culture that prioritizes rapid growth over safety oversight [14]. - The company has failed to allocate promised resources to its "super alignment" safety team, undermining its stated safety objectives [15]. - Reports of a significant security breach in 2023 went unreported to authorities or the public for an extended period, indicating a culture that prioritizes profit over safety [15]. Group 4: Conflicts of Interest - Altman has established a complex network of personal investments that directly conflict with OpenAI's mission, challenging the integrity of his role as CEO [16]. - Examples include his dual role as chairman and major investor in Helion, where he directed OpenAI to purchase energy, raising concerns about whether this was primarily for personal financial benefit [17]. - His involvement with Worldcoin and Humane further illustrates potential conflicts, as these ventures are closely tied to OpenAI's resources and technology, questioning whether decisions are made for OpenAI's mission or personal gain [18][19].