All right, good morning. It is Saturday, September the 13th. I'm Ali Veli.If you happen to have your pocket Constitution with you, it's going to become very useful in the next few minutes. This week, the Supreme Court gave federal agents the green light to geog to geographically racially profile people in the course of immigration sweeps in Los Angeles. Now, in doing so, it shattered one of the bedrocks of the American legal tradition.And my goal today is to leave you with a clear understanding of just how ...

Immigration Enforcement Concerns - The report highlights concerns about potential racial profiling in immigration enforcement tactics, with claims that individuals are targeted based on skin color [1][3][9] - The report mentions an ACLU lawsuit alleging systematic targeting of brown people by the Trump administration's immigration enforcement [3] - The report raises questions about due process and the rights of citizens and legal residents during immigration enforcement actions [10][15] Individual Experience and Perspective - Brian Gvidia, an East LA resident and former Trump voter, recounts his experience of being arrested by ICE agents despite being an American citizen [1][2] - Gvidia expresses feeling "disgusted" and regrets his vote, stating he never believed communities would be attacked in this way [6][7] - Gvidia clarifies that he believed mass deportations would target hardened criminals, not day laborers or farm workers [8] - Gvidia emphasizes the importance of following the law and respecting constitutional rights for all individuals, documented or undocumented [14][15] Administration's Stance vs Personal Accounts - The report contrasts DHS Secretary's claim that ICE agents are not profiling people by race with Gvidia's personal experience and observations [9] - Gvidia questions the administration's actions, asking what happened to him and others if racial profiling is not occurring [9] - The report conveys the fear and anxiety experienced by individuals and communities due to the current immigration enforcement climate [8][11]

The Trump administration asked the Supreme Court to lift a ban on a Los Angeles-area immigration crackdown that opponents say relies on racial profiling to decide who to detain https://t.co/f98doWKw1N ...

The Trump administration told a federal appeals court that legitimate immigration enforcement efforts in Los Angeles will be hurt by a temporary order that halted the the use of racial profiling to target individuals for detention https://t.co/UPMx47hYK7 ...

Immigration Policy & Financial Implications - The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) is offering migrants $1,000 cash and a one-way ticket out of the country as part of a self-deportation plan [2] - Taxpayer money is being used to fund the self-deportation plan [3] Concerns Regarding ICE Actions & Transparency - ICE arrested hundreds of people from Tennessee State Representative Justin Jones' district earlier this summer, and their names have not been fully released [4] - There are allegations of racial profiling and constitutional attacks targeting communities of color during ICE operations [9][10] - ICE has released the names of only 9 out of 544 migrants arrested in Nashville [22] - Families are reportedly terrified and lack information about the whereabouts of their detained loved ones [23][26] Criticism of DHS Secretary & Actions - DHS Secretary Christy Gnome is accused of wasting taxpayer money with a self-deportation plan [8] - Secretary Gnome is criticized for refusing to answer questions and engage in bipartisanship [8][9][11] - Secretary Gnome is accused of trafficking in the politics of fear, division, racial profiling, and harassment [16] - There are concerns about the treatment of migrants in detention, including being sent to foreign prison camps [23]

Joining us now, retired California Superior Court Judge Loris Cordell, New York Law School professor Rebecca Roy, and former RNC communications director Doug Hai. Everybody, thanks for being here. Judge, I want to begin with you um and and ask about this lawsuit in California, the um Ninth Circuit and then the appeal by Donald Trump to push back to say we can continue with these raids.We can continue with this profiling as they're doing. What's the likely outcome. Um, you know, Katie, thank you for even dea ...

Legal & Policy Developments - A federal judge in New Hampshire issued a nationwide block against President Trump's order to end birthright citizenship [1] - The judge granted class action status to the plaintiff but excluded parents of children whose citizenship is threatened from the protected class [1][8] - The ACLU filed a class action lawsuit following a Supreme Court decision limiting nationwide injunctions [6] - The ruling is expected to protect over 150,000 children born in the US this year, ensuring their constitutional birthright citizenship [7] Immigration Raids & Conditions - Several groups, including the city of Los Angeles, are suing the Trump administration over immigration raids [2] - Individuals are reportedly being racially profiled and swept up in immigration raids, with constitutional rights being violated [16][17] - Detainees are allegedly held in deplorable conditions, with limited access to water and counsel [18][19] - Lawyers have faced force, including tear gas, while trying to protect people's rights [19] Potential Consequences & Concerns - There are concerns about potential chaos and a humanitarian crisis if 28 states start revoking birthright citizenship [11] - The question of what happens to stateless individuals, particularly those who cannot be repatriated, is raised [12] - Concerns are expressed about the dehumanization of people and the potential for the administration to deprive people of their citizenship [14] - Comparisons are being made between ICE force and vigilantes or Gestapo due to perceived impunity [23]