Say on Pay

Search documents
International Tower Hill Mines Announces Results from 2025 Annual General Meeting of Shareholders
Prnewswireยท 2025-06-05 20:30
Group 1 - The Company held its 2025 Annual General Meeting of shareholders on June 4, 2025, in Vancouver, B.C. [1] - Shareholders elected six directors with a majority of votes, including Anton Drescher (98.65%), Karl Hanneman (99.32%), and Stuart Harshaw (99.28%) [1] - The current auditors, Davidson & Company LLP, were re-appointed for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2025 [1] Group 2 - Shareholders approved the executive compensation ("Say on Pay") with a 98.45% majority and voted 99.14% in favor of holding the Say on Pay vote annually [2] - The detailed proxy voting results will be available in the "Report of Voting Results" on the Company's profile on SEDAR+ and its website [3] Group 3 - International Tower Hill Mines Ltd. controls 100% of the Livengood Gold Project located 70 miles north of Fairbanks, Alaska [4]
The Trade Desk(TTD) - 2025 FY - Earnings Call Transcript
2025-05-27 21:00
Financial Data and Key Metrics Changes - The Trade Desk held its Annual Meeting of Stockholders on May 27, 2025, where preliminary results indicated that stockholders voted in favor of key proposals, including the 2025 Incentive Award Plan and the compensation of named executive officers [7]. Business Line Data and Key Metrics Changes - No specific data regarding individual business lines was provided during the meeting [10]. Market Data and Key Metrics Changes - No specific market data or key metrics changes were discussed during the meeting [10]. Company Strategy and Development Direction and Industry Competition - The meeting included the approval of the 2025 Incentive Award Plan, which is an amendment and restatement of the 2016 Incentive Award Plan, indicating a focus on incentivizing performance and aligning executive compensation with company goals [5]. Management's Comments on Operating Environment and Future Outlook - Management did not provide specific comments on the operating environment or future outlook during the meeting [10]. Other Important Information - The meeting was conducted in compliance with company bylaws and Nevada law, and a quorum was confirmed [3][4]. Q&A Session Summary Question: Were there any questions submitted during the meeting? - There were no questions in the queue during the Q&A session, leading to the conclusion of the Annual Meeting [10].
T. Rowe Price(TROW) - 2025 FY - Earnings Call Transcript
2025-05-08 13:00
Financial Data and Key Metrics Changes - The company closed 2024 with $1.61 trillion in assets under management and reported $43.2 billion in net client outflows, which were reduced by half year over year [32] Business Line Data and Key Metrics Changes - No specific data on individual business lines was provided in the meeting Market Data and Key Metrics Changes - No specific market data or key metrics changes were discussed in the meeting Company Strategy and Development Direction and Industry Competition - The company emphasized the importance of its associates' dedication to clients and the firm, which drives confidence in the path ahead [32] Management's Comments on Operating Environment and Future Outlook - Management expressed confidence in the future, attributing it to the dedication of associates and the firm's commitment to clients [32] Other Important Information - The company held a virtual annual meeting, which has become standard for many public companies, citing efficiency and accessibility for shareholders [25] Q&A Session All Questions and Answers Question: How does the compensation committee use the compensation actually paid total compensation figures in its calculation of the CEO target total compensation award for the upcoming year? - The compensation committee evaluates the CEO's performance independently each year and does not consider previous years' stock awards in determining the current year's award [21][22] Question: Why have in-person annual meetings not resumed after COVID? - The company finds virtual meetings to be efficient and has not received significant requests from shareholders to change the meeting format [25][26]