Core Insights - Plains All American Pipeline is compared to its competitors in the "Pipelines, Except Natural Gas" industry, highlighting its relative strengths and weaknesses in various financial metrics and analyst recommendations [1][10] Analyst Recommendations - Plains All American Pipeline has received 0 sell ratings, 0 hold ratings, 1 buy rating, and 1 strong buy rating, resulting in a rating score of 3.50, which is higher than the industry average score of 2.51 [2] Profitability - Plains All American Pipeline's net margin is 2.42%, return on equity is 11.04%, and return on assets is 4.41%. In comparison, its competitors have net margins of 32.45%, return on equity of 36.20%, and return on assets of 10.59% [4] Valuation & Earnings - Plains All American Pipeline reported gross revenue of $50.07 billion and net income of $772 million, with a price-to-earnings ratio of 15.05. Competitors have lower gross revenue of $10.13 billion and net income of $374.42 million, with a higher price-to-earnings ratio of 16.04, indicating that Plains All American Pipeline is more affordable [6] Volatility & Risk - Plains All American Pipeline has a beta of 0.59, indicating its stock price is 41% less volatile than the S&P 500, while competitors have a beta of 0.95, suggesting they are 5% less volatile than the S&P 500 [7] Dividends - The company pays an annual dividend of $1.52 per share, resulting in a dividend yield of 8.3%. However, it pays out 125.6% of its earnings as dividends, indicating potential sustainability issues compared to the industry average dividend yield of 7.6% and payout ratio of 112.0% [8] Institutional and Insider Ownership - Institutional investors hold 41.8% of Plains All American Pipeline shares, while the industry average is 47.7%. Insider ownership is at 0.9%, compared to the industry average of 2.9%, suggesting lower confidence from insiders [9]

HSBC's senior research analyst Rajesh Kumar believes Novo Nordisk (NYSE: NVO) "might have an edge†over rival Eli Lilly (NYSE: LLY) heading into 2026. His remarks arrive shortly after the Danish pharm... ...

Rightmove (OTCMKTS:RTMVY – Get Free Report) and Myseum (NASDAQ:MYSE – Get Free Report) are both communication services companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, risk, profitability, institutional ownership, earnings and dividends. Get Rightmove alerts: Earnings and ValuationThis table compares Rightmove and Myseum”s top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet Incom ...

Core Insights - LiveWorld and Genius Sports are compared based on various financial metrics and risk factors, with Genius Sports generally outperforming LiveWorld in most categories [1][9]. Profitability - LiveWorld has a net margin of 2.17%, return on equity of 4.71%, and return on assets of 2.70% [2]. - In contrast, Genius Sports shows negative profitability with a net margin of -19.71%, return on equity of -14.39%, and return on assets of -10.67% [2]. Volatility and Risk - LiveWorld has a beta of 0.17, indicating it is 83% less volatile than the S&P 500 [3]. - Genius Sports has a beta of 1.94, indicating it is 94% more volatile than the S&P 500 [3]. Earnings and Valuation - LiveWorld's gross revenue is $11.35 million, with earnings per share of $60,000 [5]. - Genius Sports has significantly higher gross revenue of $510.89 million but reports a net income loss of -$63.04 million, resulting in an earnings per share of -$0.47 [5]. Insider & Institutional Ownership - Genius Sports has 81.9% of its shares held by institutional investors, while LiveWorld has 16.3% held by insiders [6]. - Genius Sports also has 16.6% of its shares held by insiders, indicating a strong belief in its long-term growth potential [6]. Analyst Ratings - LiveWorld has no sell, hold, buy, or strong buy ratings, resulting in a rating score of 0.00 [8]. - Genius Sports has a consensus of 1 sell, 3 hold, 14 buy, and 3 strong buy ratings, with a rating score of 2.90 and a price target suggesting a potential upside of 37.58% [8].

Core Viewpoint - Costamare is identified as the stronger business compared to Robin Energy based on various financial metrics and analyst recommendations [7]. Group 1: Ownership and Institutional Support - 58.1% of Costamare shares are held by institutional investors, while 23.2% are held by company insiders, indicating strong institutional confidence in Costamare's long-term performance [1]. Group 2: Profitability Metrics - Costamare has a net margin of 22.23%, return on equity of 15.15%, and return on assets of 7.91%, while Robin Energy's profitability metrics are not available [2]. Group 3: Analyst Ratings - Costamare has a consensus rating score of 2.00, with 3 hold ratings and no buy or strong buy ratings, while Robin Energy has no ratings at all [4]. Group 4: Earnings and Valuation - Costamare's gross revenue is $2.08 billion, with a net income of $319.92 million and earnings per share of $2.50, compared to Robin Energy's gross revenue of $6.87 million, net income of $1.05 million, and earnings per share of $0.04 [6]. - Costamare's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.43, significantly lower than Robin Energy's 21.49, indicating that Costamare is more affordable [6]. Group 5: Summary of Comparison - Costamare outperforms Robin Energy in 10 out of 12 comparative factors, reinforcing its position as the more favorable investment option [7].

Core Insights - Freightcar America is positioned as a competitive player in the "TRANS – EQP&LSNG" industry, with a focus on railcar manufacturing and components for bulk commodities and containerized freight [14] Institutional Ownership - 32.0% of Freightcar America shares are held by institutional investors, compared to 86.4% for all companies in the "TRANS – EQP&LSNG" sector [1] - 28.7% of shares are held by company insiders, while the average for the sector is 10.3% [1] Analyst Recommendations - Freightcar America has a consensus price target of $9.00, indicating a potential upside of 16.13%, which is higher than the 14.81% potential upside for the sector [3][4] - The company has a rating score of 2.67, compared to 2.56 for its competitors, suggesting a more favorable outlook from analysts [3] Valuation & Earnings - Freightcar America reported gross revenue of $513.12 million and a net income of -$75.82 million, with a price-to-earnings ratio of 2.94 [7] - Competitors in the industry have a combined gross revenue of $3.78 billion and a net income of $360.72 million, with a higher price-to-earnings ratio of 6.37 [7] Profitability - Freightcar America has a net margin of -2.21%, a return on equity of -14.89%, and a return on assets of 6.92% [9] - In contrast, competitors have net margins of 10.91%, return on equity of 4.90%, and return on assets of 2.78% [9] Dividends - The company pays an annual dividend of $0.36 per share, resulting in a dividend yield of 4.6%, with a payout ratio of 13.6% [10] - The average dividend yield for the "TRANS – EQP&LSNG" sector is 1.5%, with a payout ratio of 20.0% [10] Summary - Freightcar America outperforms its competitors in 8 out of 15 evaluated factors, indicating a competitive edge in several areas [11]