Workflow
U.S. small-cap value stocks
icon
Search documents
Small Cap Value ETFs: IWN Boasts Greater Small Cap Exposure But SLYV Has a Higher Yield
Yahoo Finance· 2026-03-16 14:40
Core Viewpoint - The State Street SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF (SLYV) and the iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF (IWN) both target U.S. small-cap value stocks, but they differ in fees, number of holdings, and recent performance, with IWN showing a higher total return [1][2]. Cost & Size Comparison - SLYV has an expense ratio of 0.15%, while IWN charges 0.24%, making SLYV more cost-effective for investors [3][4]. - As of March 11, 2026, SLYV has a 1-year return of 19.4% and a dividend yield of 1.9%, compared to IWN's 25.9% return and 1.6% yield [3][4]. Performance & Risk Comparison - Over the past five years, SLYV experienced a maximum drawdown of -28.68%, while IWN had a drawdown of -26.71% [5]. - An investment of $1,000 would have grown to $1,074 in SLYV and $1,124 in IWN over the same period [5]. Portfolio Composition - IWN tracks a broad small-cap value universe with 1,402 stocks and a significant allocation in financial services (24%), industrials, and real estate [6]. - SLYV holds 460 companies, primarily in financial services, consumer cyclicals, and industrials, with a more concentrated top positions [7]. Implications for Investors - IWN offers greater diversification with nearly three times as many stock positions compared to SLYV, along with higher liquidity due to its $12.5 billion AUM versus SLYV's $4.1 billion [8].
Vanguard vs. iShares: Is VBR or IWN the Superior Small-Cap Value ETF?
Yahoo Finance· 2025-12-21 17:44
Core Insights - The Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF (VBR) and iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF (IWN) differ significantly in expense ratios, sector exposures, and recent performance, with IWN showing greater exposure to financials and a higher one-year return [2][3]. Cost & Size Comparison - VBR has an expense ratio of 0.07%, significantly lower than IWN's 0.24% - The one-year return for VBR is 10.1%, while IWN's is 14.5% - VBR offers a higher dividend yield of 1.97% compared to IWN's 1.57% - VBR has an AUM of $59.6 billion, whereas IWN has $11.8 billion [4][5]. Performance & Risk Analysis - Over five years, VBR has a max drawdown of -24.2%, while IWN's is -26.7% - An investment of $1,000 in VBR would grow to $1,687 over five years, compared to $1,555 for IWN [6]. Portfolio Composition - IWN tracks 1,407 U.S. small-cap stocks, with 26% in financial services, 12% in real estate, and 11% in industrials [7]. - VBR holds 841 stocks, with a focus on industrials (19%), financial services (18%), and consumer cyclicals (13%) [8]. Historical Performance - Since 2004, VBR has generated annualized total returns of 9.2%, outperforming IWN's 7.8% [10].