- Singapore foreign minister warns of fallout from US-China rivalry- HSBC CEO says ‘Asia buys Asia’ is key new trend in global trade- Ex-Barclays CEO says markets seeing ‘healthy correction’ recentlyFollow our live blog for the biggest conversations from the #BloombergNewEconomy Forum https://t.co/KOsWi3J7HA ...

Core Insights - Geopolitical risk has become a central concern for businesses, moving from a historically remote issue to a daily consideration [1][2] - Companies across all sectors are advised to maintain constant vigilance regarding geopolitical developments, particularly due to the escalating US-China rivalry [2][3] Geopolitical Context - The US-China rivalry is characterized as a chronic and intensifying superpower competition, with economic tools like sanctions and tariffs being primary instruments [2][3] - The rivalry creates a scenario where companies have "nowhere to hide" from its impacts, necessitating a reevaluation of risk management strategies [2] Business Implications - The adversarial nature of the US-China relationship influences political and business decisions, especially concerning non-aligned countries such as India [3] - The report highlights that the rivalry is in its early stages, indicating a prolonged period of geopolitical tension with no foreseeable resolution [3] Economic Spillovers - There are significant economic spillovers resulting from hyper-globalization and hyper-digitalization, which amplify the effects of geopolitical tensions [3] - The use of economic measures as weapons has become prevalent, with little room for compromise on critical issues [3] Conflict Risks - The report identifies that the most severe threats to trade and investment arise when geopolitical tensions escalate into armed conflicts, as seen in various global hotspots [5] - Potential conflicts in East Asia, particularly around Taiwan, are highlighted as particularly concerning, with implications for global supply chains and investment [5] Sector-Specific Vulnerabilities - Certain sectors, especially technology and energy (including green energy), are described as being highly 'geopoliticised' and susceptible to being weaponized [6] - Geopolitical tensions are intertwined with other global challenges, such as the climate crisis and migration, creating complex feedback loops that affect business operations [6]

Core Points - The Dutch government's takeover of Nexperia's management has led to tensions with Beijing, resulting in export controls on products from Nexperia and its subcontractors in China [1] - Nexperia China has openly defied orders from its head office in the Netherlands, indicating internal conflict within the company [1] Group 1: Government Actions and Reactions - The Dutch authorities invoked a 1952 law to seize management of Nexperia due to concerns over potential production halts at its factories in Hamburg and Manchester, driven by mismanagement fears related to CEO Zhang Xuezheng [4] - The U.S. has exerted pressure in the background, particularly after placing Wingtech, Nexperia's parent company, on a trade blacklist, which increased risk exposure for Nexperia [5] Group 2: Implications for International Relations - The Nexperia dispute, alongside China's rare earth export controls, may prompt Europe to reconsider its business ties with China, highlighting a lack of unity among European member states regarding the tools to address these issues [6] - Europe is navigating a new geopolitical landscape, with varying perspectives on dependency on the U.S. and China, indicating a shift in international relations dynamics [7]

RT Stephanie Lai (@stephaniealai)NEW: President Trump plans to deliver a major address on AI next week outlining his vision to ensure American dominance at an event hosted by the All-In Podcast, marking his biggest statement on the emerging technology at the heart of the US-China rivalry. https://t.co/qzTQul8gE2 ...