Meta is blocking users from sharing links to a controversial website called "ICE List," which allegedly published thousands of names of Department of Homeland Security (DHS) employees, including immigration enforcement agents. The site, created in 2025, claims to "document federal immigration enforcement, preserve evidence and maintain a public record for accountability." However, critics claim the document dump could be considered doxxing. JD VANCE SHARES ‘CRAZY' STORY OF ICE AND CBP OFFICERS BEING MOBBED ...

Partnerships & Technology - Brevis 与 Aster 合作，通过可验证计算提高速度、安全性和隐私 [1] - Brevis 将复杂的链上计算转移到链下，并通过零知识证明进行验证，以降低成本 [1] - 双方将探索在保持市场透明度的同时保护用户隐私的方法 [1]

Core Insights - Meta Platforms, led by Mark Zuckerberg, has agreed to pay $190 million to resolve allegations from shareholders regarding privacy violations affecting Facebook users [1] Group 1 - The settlement aims to address claims that the leadership of Meta damaged the company by not adequately protecting user privacy [1] - The agreement involves both current and former leaders of Meta Platforms [1]

Group 1 - A California jury found Meta in violation of state user privacy laws in a class-action suit related to the Flo app, which tracks menstrual health data [1][2] - Plaintiffs accused Meta and Flo of collecting private health data without user consent, violating the California Invasion of Privacy Act [2] - The lawsuit, filed in 2021, also included Google and ad analytics companies as defendants, with Google settling the case in July and Flo settling earlier this month [2] Group 2 - Lead trial attorneys stated that the verdict emphasizes the importance of protecting digital health data and holding Big Tech accountable for user privacy [3] - Meta disagreed with the verdict, asserting that it never eavesdropped on Flo users and is exploring legal options [4] - Flo raised $200 million in Series C funding last year, achieving a valuation of over $1 billion [6]

Core Viewpoint - The U.K. government is retracting its demand for Apple to create a backdoor for customer data access, influenced by U.S. government opposition, while questions arise about similar demands made to other tech companies like Google [1][2]. Group 1: U.K. Government's Demand - The U.K. Home Office sought a secret court order for Apple to allow access to end-to-end encrypted cloud data of customers worldwide, including iPhone and iPad backups [2]. - Under U.K. law, tech companies like Apple are prohibited from disclosing the existence of such secret surveillance orders, despite public leaks [3]. Group 2: Responses from Tech Companies - Meta confirmed it has not received any orders to backdoor its encrypted services, unlike the situation reported with Apple [5]. - Google has not disclosed whether it has received a U.K. government order for accessing encrypted data, stating that if it had, it would be legally barred from revealing that information [5][6]. Group 3: Legislative Actions - Senator Ron Wyden has called for transparency regarding the national security risks associated with the U.K.'s surveillance laws and its demands on U.S. companies [7].

Group 1 - Meta executives, including Mark Zuckerberg, have settled a lawsuit from shareholders seeking $8 billion for damages related to privacy violations during the Cambridge Analytica scandal [1] - The lawsuit alleged that executives intentionally violated a Federal Trade Commission (FTC) agreement by sharing user data without consent, leading to a $5 billion fine in 2019 for non-compliance with a 2012 agreement [2] - The trial was anticipated to include testimonies from notable figures such as Zuckerberg, former COO Sheryl Sandberg, and other prominent executives [3]