Core Argument - The modern space industry risks repeating colonial patterns of exploitation in space, driven by a desire for being first, occupying the most space, and using more resources than one planet can provide [3][4][5] - Indigenous cultures offer valuable perspectives on humanity's relationship with the cosmos, emphasizing respect, sustainability, and interconnectedness, contrasting with the exploitative approach of the modern space industry [7][10][11] - Current conservation efforts, including designated zones, are insufficient to protect species or habitats, highlighting the need for holistic and sustainable approaches [12][13][14] Proposed Solution - The industry should embrace indigenous-led astroenvironmentalism, drawing on the 65,000 years of experience of Aboriginal and Toouristra Islander communities in caring for country [15][16] - A shift in perspective is needed, viewing space not as a frontier to be conquered but as a shared heritage and a part of our home, recognizing the interconnectedness of land, sea, and sky [17][11] Historical Context - The speech by the former US President Donald Trump used terms reminiscent of European colonial conquest, paralleling the concept of terranullius used to justify the seizure of indigenous lands in Australia [1][2][3] - The term "outer space" is in direct opposition to indigenous communities' understanding of their relationship with the sky, where land, sea, and sky are all connected [11]