strongest presumption of validity. >> I I just don't understand this argument. Um it's not an article. It's a congressional power, not a presidential power to tax.And you want to say tariffs are not taxes, but that's exactly what they are. The generating money from American citizens, revenue. And you say it's incidental to the regulatory purpose, but I don't see how a quota is equivalent to revenue raising.A quota sets a limit to what you can import in, but it doesn't generate revenue. I I I I don't underst ...