ALLEGATIONS: The complaint alleges that during the class period, Defendants issued materially false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (1) Semler Scientific did not disclose a material investigation by the United States Department of Justice into violations of the False Claims Act, while discussing possible violations of the False Claims Act in hypothetical terms; and (2) as a result, defendants' public statements were materially false and/or misleading at all relevant times. DEADL ...

Group 1 - Kuehn Law, PLLC is investigating potential breaches of fiduciary duties by certain officers and directors of PepGen Inc. [1] - The investigation is focused on whether these breaches have negatively impacted shareholders [1] - PepGen Inc. is listed on NASDAQ under the ticker symbol PEPG [1]

Core Viewpoint - Neogen Corporation (NASDAQ: NEOG) is facing a class action lawsuit due to allegations of issuing materially false and misleading statements regarding its integration with the Food Safety Division of 3M Company, which misled investors about the progress of the integration [3]. Group 1 - The class period for the lawsuit is from January 5, 2023, to June 3, 2025 [3]. - Allegations include that the defendants downplayed inefficiencies arising from the integration and assured investors of their commitment to resolving these issues quickly [3]. - Shareholders are encouraged to register for the class action by the deadline of September 16, 2025, to potentially become lead plaintiffs [4]. Group 2 - The Gross Law Firm is a nationally recognized class action law firm dedicated to protecting investors' rights against deceit and fraud [5]. - The firm aims to ensure companies adhere to responsible business practices and seeks recovery for investors who suffered losses due to misleading statements [5].

Core Viewpoint - Morgan & Morgan is representing customers in a mass legal action against The Hertz Corporation and its brands over a data breach that exposed personal information of thousands of customers [1][2]. Group 1: Incident Details - The data breach was disclosed by Hertz in April 2025 and originated from a cyberattack on a third-party vendor, Cleo Communications, occurring between October and December 2024 [1]. - The exposed information includes names, contact information, dates of birth, driver's license numbers, and credit card details, with some individuals also having their Social Security numbers and passport information compromised [2]. Group 2: Legal Action - The legal action is being handled as a mass arbitration, with plaintiffs alleging that Hertz failed to implement adequate data security measures and was slow to notify affected customers [3]. - Morgan & Morgan is seeking financial damages for customers and injunctions to compel Hertz and its vendors to improve their cybersecurity practices [3]. Group 3: Accountability and Impact - The legal action aims to hold companies accountable for failing to protect sensitive information, emphasizing the significant harm caused by the loss of control over personal data [4]. - The action is in its early stages, focusing on determining the full extent of damages and securing compensation for affected individuals [4]. Group 4: Firm Background - Morgan & Morgan has successfully litigated several similar data breach cases against major corporations, securing millions of dollars for impacted individuals [5]. - The firm has recovered over $25 billion for more than 700,000 clients across various practice areas, including national mass torts and class actions [6].

Core Points - Tecnoglass Inc. has filed a federal defamation lawsuit against short seller Christian Lamarco and his firm Culper Research for allegedly publishing false claims linking the company to the Sinaloa cartel [1][2][3] - The lawsuit claims that Culper Research profited from short positions by spreading fabricated allegations based on inauthentic intelligence documents confirmed by the Mexican government [2] - The complaint highlights that this is not the first instance of defamation suits against Lamarco and Culper Research, and it seeks damages, attorneys' fees, and an injunction for the removal of the defamatory statements [3]

Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm is reminding purchasers of Lineage, Inc. common stock about the September 30, 2025 lead plaintiff deadline for a class action lawsuit related to the company's July 2024 IPO [1]. Group 1: Class Action Details - Investors who purchased Lineage common stock may be entitled to compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [2]. - A class action lawsuit has already been filed, and those wishing to serve as lead plaintiff must act by September 30, 2025 [3]. - The lawsuit claims that the registration statement was false and/or misleading, failing to disclose significant issues affecting Lineage's business operations and financial results [5]. Group 2: Allegations Against Lineage - The lawsuit alleges that Lineage experienced a sustained weakening in customer demand due to increased cold-storage supply and destocking of excessive inventory by customers [5]. - It is claimed that Lineage implemented unsustainable price increases prior to the IPO, which could not be maintained in the face of weakening demand [5]. - The company reportedly could not counteract adverse trends through operational efficiencies or competitive advantages, leading to stagnant or falling revenue, occupancy rates, and rent prices [5]. Group 3: Rosen Law Firm's Credentials - Rosen Law Firm emphasizes the importance of selecting qualified counsel with a successful track record in securities class actions, highlighting its own achievements in this area [4]. - The firm has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors, including over $438 million in 2019 alone [4]. - Rosen Law Firm has been recognized for its leadership in securities class action settlements, ranking No. 1 in 2017 and consistently in the top 4 since 2013 [4].

Core Viewpoint - Neogen Corporation (NASDAQ: NEOG) is facing a class action lawsuit due to allegations of issuing materially false and misleading statements regarding its integration with the Food Safety Division of 3M Company, which misled investors about the progress of the integration [3]. Group 1 - The class period for the lawsuit is from January 5, 2023, to June 3, 2025 [3]. - Allegations include that the company downplayed inefficiencies arising from the integration and assured investors of their commitment to resolving these issues quickly [3]. - Shareholders are encouraged to register for the class action by September 16, 2025, to potentially become lead plaintiffs [4]. Group 2 - The Gross Law Firm is representing the shareholders and is recognized for protecting investors' rights against deceit and fraud [5]. - The firm aims to ensure companies adhere to responsible business practices and seeks recovery for investors who suffered losses due to misleading statements [5].

Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm has announced a class action lawsuit on behalf of purchasers of Tronox Holdings plc common stock during the specified Class Period, indicating potential legal issues surrounding the company's financial disclosures and performance [1][5]. Group 1: Lawsuit Details - The class action lawsuit is filed for purchasers of Tronox common stock between February 12, 2025, and July 30, 2025, inclusive [1]. - Investors who purchased Tronox stock during this period may be entitled to compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [2]. - The lawsuit alleges that Tronox provided misleading statements about its commercial division and failed to accurately forecast demand for its products, leading to a decline in sales and increased costs [5]. Group 2: Next Steps for Investors - Interested investors can join the class action by visiting the provided link or contacting the law firm directly for more information [3][6]. - A lead plaintiff must file a motion with the court by November 3, 2025, to represent other class members in the litigation [1][3]. Group 3: Rosen Law Firm's Credentials - Rosen Law Firm has a strong track record in securities class actions, having achieved significant settlements for investors, including over $438 million in 2019 alone [4]. - The firm has been recognized for its success in securities class action settlements, ranking highly in the industry since 2013 [4].

Core Insights - Ryan Clinton has joined Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP as a partner to lead the firm's Texas appeals practice, bringing extensive experience in state and federal appeals, particularly in the energy sector [1][5] Company Overview - Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP has a strong issues and appeals practice, represented by a team that has handled cases in federal and state appellate courts nationwide, including the U.S. Supreme Court [8] - The firm has a long-standing history of over 120 years, known for its expertise in various industries such as energy, financial services, real estate, and technology [9] Ryan Clinton's Background - Clinton has a notable background, having served as an assistant solicitor general for Texas and has represented clients in numerous high-profile cases, including ten appearances before the Texas Supreme Court [2][4] - He is Board Certified in Civil Appellate Law and holds a Band 3 ranking in Chambers USA for Oil & Gas Litigation [6] Notable Cases - Clinton's significant representations include challenging a $125 million arbitration award, disputes over mineral interests, and defending against allegations of fraudulent inducement, resulting in favorable outcomes for his clients [12]

Core Viewpoint - MediaAlpha, Inc. is facing legal scrutiny due to allegations of consumer deception and misconduct related to its marketing practices, leading to a settlement with the FTC involving a $45 million fine [2]. Group 1: Legal Issues - Julie & Holleman LLP is investigating potential misconduct by MediaAlpha's directors and officers in light of recent litigation from the FTC [1]. - The FTC charged MediaAlpha with deceiving consumers into purchasing health care plans that did not deliver the promised coverage and overwhelming them with telemarketing and robocalls [2]. - MediaAlpha agreed to settle the FTC's claims by paying a fine of $45 million on August 6, 2025 [2]. Group 2: Firm Information - Julie & Holleman LLP specializes in shareholder litigation, including derivative actions, mergers and acquisitions cases, securities fraud class actions, and corporate investigations [4]. - The firm has a track record of securing hundreds of millions of dollars for aggrieved companies and their shareholders [4].