Is data a big moat for RV. >> Yeah, I think there's two types of data. And so when we started the company, I think everyone thought of legal data as case law. >> And we've now partnered with Lexus and I think having access to case law and these other data sets is super valuable.But I don't think that is when we think of like the data mode that we think we're going to have as a company. The data that I think is really valuable that I think now people are realizing is valuable is the RLHF data or the reasonin ...

Core Viewpoint - Kirby McInerney LLP is investigating potential violations of federal securities laws by Barnes & Noble Education, Inc. and its senior management, following a disclosure regarding a possible overstatement of accounts receivable [1][2]. Summary by Sections Investigation Details - On July 18, 2025, Barnes & Noble revealed that management identified issues related to the recording of digital sales costs, leading to a potential overstatement of up to $23.0 million in accounts receivable as of May 3, 2025 [2]. - Following this announcement, Barnes & Noble's share price fell by $2.36, approximately 21%, closing at $8.87 per share on July 21, 2025 [2]. Investor Actions - Investors who purchased or acquired Barnes & Noble securities and have relevant information are encouraged to contact Kirby McInerney LLP to discuss their rights or interests regarding the investigation at no cost [3]. Law Firm Background - Kirby McInerney LLP is a New York-based law firm specializing in securities, antitrust, whistleblower, and consumer litigation, with a history of recovering billions of dollars for shareholders in securities litigation [4].

Core Viewpoint - A class action lawsuit has been filed against DeFi Technologies on behalf of investors who acquired its securities during the specified class period, alleging misleading statements and failure to disclose critical business challenges [1][2]. Summary by Sections Lawsuit Details - The lawsuit claims that DeFi Technologies faced delays in executing its DeFi arbitrage strategy, which was a key revenue driver [2]. - It is alleged that the company understated the competition from other digital asset treasury companies, impacting its ability to execute its strategy [2]. - The lawsuit also states that DeFi was unlikely to meet its previously issued revenue guidance for fiscal year 2025 due to these issues [2]. Financial Impact - On November 6, 2025, DeFi reported a decline in share price by approximately 7.43%, dropping from $1.75 to $1.62 following a press release about arbitrage trade delays [3]. - On November 14, 2025, DeFi announced a nearly 20% revenue decline, significantly lowering its 2025 revenue forecast from $218.6 million to approximately $116.6 million, attributing this to delays in executing arbitrage opportunities [4]. - Following this announcement, DeFi's share price fell by approximately 14.63%, from $1.23 to $1.05 [4]. Investor Actions - Investors who suffered losses on their DeFi investments have until January 20, 2026, to request lead plaintiff appointment in the class action lawsuit [2][5]. - The lead plaintiff appointment process allows investors with the largest financial loss to represent the class, influencing case strategy and settlement decisions [5].

Core Viewpoint - StubHub Holdings, Inc. is facing a class action lawsuit due to alleged securities fraud related to its initial public offering (IPO) and subsequent financial disclosures, which reportedly misled investors about the company's financial health and operations [1][6]. Group 1: IPO and Financial Performance - StubHub conducted its IPO on September 17, 2025, selling approximately 34 million shares at $23.50 per share [2]. - In the third quarter of 2025, StubHub reported a free cash flow of negative $4.6 million, a 143% decrease from the previous year's positive free cash flow of $10.6 million [3]. - The company's net cash provided by operating activities was $3.8 million, down 69.3% from $12.4 million in the same period the previous year [3]. Group 2: Stock Price Reaction - Following the negative financial results announced on November 13, 2025, StubHub's stock price fell by $3.95 per share, or 20.9%, closing at $14.87 on November 14, 2025 [4]. - By the time the lawsuit commenced, StubHub's stock was trading as low as $10.31 per share, representing a nearly 56% decline from the IPO price [5]. Group 3: Allegations in the Lawsuit - The class action lawsuit alleges that the Registration Statement was materially false and misleading, failing to disclose significant adverse facts about the company's business and operations [6]. - Specific allegations include undisclosed changes in the timing of payments to vendors, which adversely affected free cash flow, and misleading statements regarding the company's financial health [6].

Core Viewpoint - A class action lawsuit has been filed against StubHub Holdings, Inc. by Kirby McInerney LLP on behalf of investors who acquired StubHub securities during its September 2025 IPO, alleging that the company failed to disclose significant financial issues that misled investors [1][2]. Summary by Sections Lawsuit Details - The lawsuit claims that StubHub did not disclose changes in payment timing to vendors, which adversely affected free cash flow, leading to materially misleading financial reports and IPO offering documents [2]. - Investors who suffered losses have until January 23, 2026, to request lead plaintiff appointment [2]. Financial Impact - StubHub reported a negative free cash flow of $4.6 million for Q3 2025, a 143% decrease from the previous year's positive free cash flow of $10.6 million [3]. - Following this earnings report, StubHub's stock price dropped by $3.95, or approximately 21.0%, from $18.82 to $14.87 per share [3]. - By November 24, 2025, StubHub's stock price fell to $12.01, nearly 50% below its IPO price of $23.50 per share [4].

Core Viewpoint - Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP is investigating potential claims against StubHub Holdings, Inc. due to allegations of misleading information in the company's registration statement during its IPO on September 17, 2025 [2][4]. Summary by Sections Legal Investigation - Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP is encouraging investors who suffered losses in StubHub to contact them for discussing legal options [1]. - The firm is reminding investors of the January 23, 2026 deadline to seek the role of lead plaintiff in a federal securities class action against StubHub [2]. Allegations Against StubHub - The class action complaint alleges that the registration statement was materially false and/or misleading, failing to disclose significant adverse facts about the company's business and operations [4]. - Specific undisclosed issues included changes in payment timing to vendors, which adversely affected free cash flow, leading to misleading reports [4]. Financial Performance - StubHub's IPO priced at $23.50 per share, with approximately 34 million shares sold [4]. - Following the release of third-quarter financial results on November 13, 2025, the company reported a free cash flow of negative $4.6 million, a 143% decrease from the previous year's positive $10.6 million [5]. - The company's net cash provided by operating activities was reported at $3.8 million, a 69.3% decrease from $12.4 million in the prior year [5][6]. Stock Price Impact - After the negative financial news, StubHub's stock price fell by $3.95 per share, or 20.9%, closing at $14.87 on November 14, 2025 [7]. - By the time of the legal action, the stock was trading as low as $10.31 per share, representing a nearly 56% decline from the IPO price [7].

Core Viewpoint - StubHub Holdings, Inc. is facing a class action lawsuit for alleged violations of federal securities laws, primarily due to misleading statements regarding its financial performance during its IPO period [1][4]. Summary by Sections Lawsuit Details - The Schall Law Firm has filed a class action lawsuit against StubHub Holdings, Inc. for securities fraud, encouraging affected investors to join the case [1][4]. - Investors who purchased StubHub securities during its IPO on September 17, 2025, are invited to contact the firm before January 23, 2026, to discuss their rights [2]. Allegations - The complaint alleges that StubHub made false and misleading statements that materially affected its reported free cash flow, which was impacted by changes in vendor payment timing [4]. - The misleading public statements persisted throughout the IPO period, leading to investor losses once the true financial situation was revealed [4]. Legal Representation - The Schall Law Firm specializes in securities class action lawsuits and represents investors globally [5].

Core Viewpoint - Glancy Prongay & Murray LLP has filed a class action lawsuit against StubHub Holdings, Inc. on behalf of shareholders who purchased stock during the company's September 2025 IPO, alleging securities fraud due to misleading statements in the registration statement [1][7]. Company Overview - StubHub conducted its IPO on September 17, 2025, selling approximately 34 million shares of Class A common stock at a price of $23.50 per share [3]. - Following the IPO, StubHub reported negative free cash flow of $4.6 million for Q3 2025, a 143% decrease from the previous year's positive free cash flow of $10.6 million [4]. - The company's net cash provided by operating activities also decreased by 69.3%, from $12.4 million in the previous year to $3.8 million [4]. Stock Performance - After the Q3 2025 financial results were announced, StubHub's stock price fell by $3.95 per share, or 20.9%, closing at $14.87 on November 14, 2025 [5]. - By the time the lawsuit commenced, StubHub's stock was trading as low as $10.31 per share, representing a nearly 56% decline from the IPO price [6]. Allegations in the Lawsuit - The lawsuit claims that the registration statement was materially false and misleading, failing to disclose significant adverse facts about the company's business and operations [7]. - Specific allegations include undisclosed changes in the timing of payments to vendors, which adversely impacted free cash flow, leading to misleading reports [8].

Core Viewpoint - The Law Offices of Frank R. Cruz is investigating potential claims against the board of directors of Western Alliance Bancorporation regarding possible breaches of fiduciary duties to shareholders [1][2]. Group 1: Investigation Details - The investigation focuses on whether the board of directors grossly mismanaged the company and breached its fiduciary duties to shareholders [2][3]. - Shareholders who purchased Western Alliance shares before October 2025 are encouraged to participate in the investigation [3]. Group 2: Contact Information - Interested shareholders can contact Frank R. Cruz at The Law Offices of Frank R. Cruz for inquiries regarding their rights and interests [3]. - Contact details include a phone number (310-914-5007) and an email address (info@frankcruzlaw.com) [3].

Core Viewpoint - Jayud Global Logistics Limited is facing a class action lawsuit for securities fraud, with allegations of false and misleading statements made to the market, benefiting from a fraudulent stock promotion scheme [5]. Group 1: Lawsuit Details - The class action lawsuit is against Jayud Global Logistics Limited for violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 [1]. - Investors who purchased securities between April 21, 2023, and April 30, 2025, are encouraged to contact the Schall Law Firm before January 20, 2026 [2]. - The class has not yet been certified, meaning potential participants are not currently represented by an attorney [4]. Group 2: Allegations Against the Company - The complaint alleges that Jayud engaged in a fraudulent stock promotion scheme involving impersonated financial professionals and misinformation on social media [5]. - The company, along with insiders and affiliates, reportedly used offshore accounts to sell shares when prices were inflated, leading to materially misleading public statements [5]. - Investors suffered damages when the truth about Jayud was revealed to the market [5].