Financial Data and Key Metrics Changes - The company reported an adjusted net loss of $3.09 per share and an adjusted EBITDA loss of $258.8 million for the first quarter [20][21] - Cash flow used in operations for the quarter was $661.4 million, which included a working capital headwind of approximately $330 million [23] - The company ended the quarter with approximately $469 million in cash and $1.77 billion of net debt, with a net debt to capitalization ratio of 29% [24][25] Business Line Data and Key Metrics Changes - The Martinez refinery has restarted a number of unaffected units, operating in a limited configuration of 85,000 to 105,000 barrels per day [7][9] - The company is producing limited quantities of finished gasoline and jet fuel for California markets and intermediates for further processing at Torrance [8][10] - The company expects to generate over $200 million of annualized run rate sustainable cost savings by year-end 2025 through its refining business improvement program [17] Market Data and Key Metrics Changes - Gasoline stocks are below the five-year average, and distillate stocks are at the bottom of the range, indicating improving fundamentals as the driving season approaches [10] - The company anticipates that the reintroduction of incremental OPEC plus barrels will benefit its operations as tight differentials begin to loosen [11] Company Strategy and Development Direction - The company announced the sale of its Knoxville and Philadelphia terminal assets for $175 million, expected to close in the second half of the year [12] - The company is focused on controlling aspects of its business to position itself for future market cycles, emphasizing safe, reliable, and efficient operations [12][19] Management's Comments on Operating Environment and Future Outlook - Management noted that the current economic environment is tumultuous, but demand is resilient and showing signs of strength [6][10] - The company is optimistic about the long-term demand growth exceeding net refining capacity additions, creating a constructive setup for the global refining environment [11] - Management expressed confidence in the liquidity position and plans to reduce inventory and leverage insurance proceeds to bolster financial stability [25][90] Other Important Information - The company received a first installment of $250 million from its insurance program, expected to be received in the second quarter [9][20] - The company has a revised total capital budget for 2025 in the range of $750 million to $775 million, excluding costs related to the Martinez rebuild [18] Q&A Session Summary Question: Update on Martinez repair process and timeline - Management indicated no change in the timeline for repairs, with long lead items ordered and execution dependent on equipment arrival [32] Question: Integration of product movement from Martinez to Torrance - Management confirmed that the integration is currently happening, with Torrance fully operational [33] Question: Concerns regarding RINs and renewable diesel market - Management highlighted the instability in the RIN market and its potential impact on gasoline prices and refining capacity [36][40] Question: Outlook on crude quality discounts and OPEC's impact - Management expects OPEC's actions to widen differentials, positively impacting the company's operations [47][48] Question: California's regulatory environment for refiners - Management noted a recognition of the importance of in-state refining and the need for a level playing field in regulations [52][55] Question: Net debt trajectory and financing needs - Management stated that they do not anticipate needing additional financing at this time, focusing on maintaining a resilient balance sheet [59] Question: Operating costs in California for Q2 - Management did not provide specific numbers for California operating costs but indicated that it would be difficult to dissect due to various factors [70][71] Question: Examples of unexpected opportunities in the RBI program - Management reported that energy and turnaround performance have shown significant opportunities, aligning with initial expectations [74] Question: Working capital headwinds and liquidity confidence - Management acknowledged working capital headwinds but expressed confidence in liquidity levels and ongoing initiatives to stabilize operations [89][90]

Financial Data and Key Metrics Changes - The company reported an adjusted net loss of $3.09 per share and an adjusted EBITDA loss of $258.8 million for Q1 2025, excluding special items related to the Martinez incident [21][22] - Cash flow used in operations for the quarter was $661.4 million, impacted by a working capital headwind of approximately $330 million [24] - The company ended the quarter with approximately $469 million in cash and $1.77 billion of net debt, with a net debt to capitalization ratio of 29% [25] Business Line Data and Key Metrics Changes - The Martinez refinery has restarted several units, operating in a limited configuration of 85,000 to 105,000 barrels per day, supplying limited quantities of finished gasoline and jet fuel [6][7] - The company expects to receive an insurance payment of $250 million related to the Martinez incident, which will aid in recovery efforts [21][22] Market Data and Key Metrics Changes - Gasoline stocks are reported to be below the five-year average, while distillate stocks are at the bottom of the range, indicating improving market fundamentals [8] - The company anticipates that the reintroduction of incremental OPEC plus barrels will benefit its operations as differentials for preferred heavy and sour feedstocks begin to loosen [10][11] Company Strategy and Development Direction - The company announced the sale of its Knoxville and Philadelphia terminal assets for $175 million as part of its strategy to optimize its asset portfolio [12] - The company is focused on generating over $200 million in annualized run rate sustainable cost savings by the end of 2025 through its refining business improvement program [17] Management's Comments on Operating Environment and Future Outlook - Management expressed optimism about the demand for refined products, noting that the fundamentals are improving as the driving season approaches [7][8] - The company is preparing for potential challenges in the market, including the impact of tariffs and regulatory changes in California, while emphasizing the importance of maintaining a competitive business environment [54][112] Other Important Information - The company has initiated a cost savings program that has generated over 500 ideas, focusing on various operational areas to enhance efficiency [16] - The revised total capital budget for 2025 is now in the range of $750 million to $775 million, excluding costs related to the Martinez rebuild [19] Q&A Session Summary Question: Update on Martinez repairs and timeline - Management indicated that long lead items have been ordered, and there is no change in the timeline for repairs at this point [35] Question: Status of product movement from Martinez to Torrance - The integration of product movement is currently happening, with Torrance fully operational [36] Question: Concerns regarding renewable diesel and RINs - Management highlighted the instability in the current market, with D4 RIN prices surging due to various factors, including tariffs and supply issues [39][41] Question: Outlook on crude quality discounts and OPEC's impact - Management expects that OPEC's actions will lead to widening differentials, positively impacting the company's operations [50] Question: California's regulatory environment and refinery closures - Management noted a recognition of the importance of in-state refining and the need for a level playing field for market participants [55][112] Question: Net debt trajectory and financing needs - The company does not anticipate needing additional financing at this time, focusing on maintaining a strong balance sheet [63] Question: Operating costs in California for Q2 - Management did not provide specific numbers for California operating costs but indicated ongoing efforts to manage expenses [73] Question: Examples of unexpected opportunities in the RBI program - Management reported that energy and turnaround performance have shown significant opportunities, aligning with initial expectations [78]

First quarter loss from operations of $511.2 million (excluding special items, first quarter loss from operations of $441.8 million) Partial operations restored at Martinez refinery Declared quarterly dividend of $0.275 per share Announces sale of terminal assets for $175 million PBF received notice that its insurers agreed to pay a net $250 million unallocated first installment of insurance proceeds related to the Martinez incidentPARSIPPANY, N.J., May 1, 2025 /PRNewswire/ -- PBF Energy Inc. (NYSE:PBF) to ...

Financial Data and Key Metrics Changes - For the first quarter of 2025, the company reported a consolidated net loss of $105 million and a loss per share of $1.22, with EBITDA also reflecting a loss of $61 million [5][13] - Adjusted EBITDA for the quarter was $24 million, while adjusted loss per share was $0.58 [13] - The negative mark to market impact on outstanding RFS obligations was $112 million, with a favorable inventory valuation impact of $24 million [13] Business Line Data and Key Metrics Changes - In the Petroleum segment, total throughput for Q1 2025 was approximately 125,000 barrels per day, with a light product yield of 95% [5][6] - Adjusted EBITDA for the Petroleum segment was a loss of $30 million, driven by reduced throughput volumes due to planned and unplanned downtime [13] - The Renewables segment achieved an adjusted EBITDA of $3 million, an improvement from a negative $5 million in the prior year, primarily due to higher throughput volumes and increased RIN prices [11][14] - The Fertilizer segment reported an adjusted EBITDA of $53 million, supported by higher UAN sales volumes and ammonia sales prices [14] Market Data and Key Metrics Changes - Group 3 2-1-1 benchmark cracks averaged $17.65 per barrel in Q1 2025, down from $19.55 per barrel in the same period last year [6] - Average RIN prices were approximately $0.84, an increase of over 25% from the previous year [6] - Days of gasoline supply were reported to be 12% below the five-year average, while diesel supply was 17% below [19] Company Strategy and Development Direction - The company plans to ramp up refinery operations to full rates over the second quarter of 2025, with no additional turnarounds planned until 2027 [6][17] - The company is focusing on reducing debt and restoring balance sheet leverage ratios while looking for ways to improve capture and reduce costs [25] - The company is optimistic about the potential for increased jet fuel production, which is not subject to RVO, thereby reducing annual RIN obligations [21][22] Management's Comments on Operating Environment and Future Outlook - Management noted that refining market conditions began to improve in Q1 2025, driven by a heavy spring maintenance season and refinery closures [18] - The company expressed confidence in recovering strong margins post-turnaround, despite challenges faced during the Coffeyville turnaround [46][47] - Management highlighted the importance of government support for renewable businesses, indicating a cautious approach to further investments in renewables without assurance of stable credits [56] Other Important Information - The company ended Q1 2025 with a consolidated cash balance of $695 million and total liquidity of approximately $894 million [16] - Significant cash uses included $94 million for capital and turnaround spending, and $113 million for working capital, primarily associated with inventory buildup during the turnaround [16] Q&A Session Summary Question: Understanding refining macro and demand resilience - Management indicated that days of supply have shrunk, suggesting a correcting supply-demand balance, with expectations for summer demand to influence gasoline and diesel markets [28] Question: RVO and SRE implications - Management believes decoupling D4 from D6 is important and criticized the government's handling of RFS, emphasizing the need for lower RIN prices to benefit consumers [31][32][33] Question: Renewable diesel EBITDA expectations - Management noted that RIN prices and feedstock costs are favorable, but emphasized the need for clarity on PTC rules before making further investments [36][37] Question: Jet expansion at Coffeyville - Management expressed confidence in securing contracts with major airlines as existing contracts expire, indicating a positive outlook for jet fuel demand [52] Question: Insider activity at the company - Management refrained from commenting on insider activity, suggesting inquiries should be directed to the individuals involved [80]

Financial Data and Key Metrics Changes - The company reported a consolidated net loss of $105 million for Q1 2025, with a loss per share of $1.22 and an EBITDA loss of $61 million [6][15] - Adjusted EBITDA for the quarter was $24 million, with an adjusted loss per share of $0.58 [15] - The negative mark to market impact on outstanding RFS obligations was $112 million, while there was a favorable inventory valuation impact of $24 million [15] Business Line Data and Key Metrics Changes - In the Petroleum segment, total throughput was approximately 125,000 barrels per day, with a light product yield of 95% [6] - Adjusted EBITDA for the Petroleum segment was a loss of $30 million, driven by reduced throughput volumes and lower product cracks [15] - The Renewables segment achieved an adjusted EBITDA of $3 million, an improvement from a negative $5 million in the prior year [15] - The Fertilizer segment reported an adjusted EBITDA of $53 million, driven by higher UAN sales volumes and ammonia sales prices [15] Market Data and Key Metrics Changes - Group 3 2-1-1 benchmark cracks averaged $17.65 per barrel in Q1 2025, down from $19.55 per barrel in the same period last year [8] - Average RIN prices were approximately $0.84, an increase of over 25% from the previous year [8] - Nitrogen fertilizer prices were higher for ammonia and slightly lower for UAN compared to Q1 2024 [13] Company Strategy and Development Direction - The company plans no additional turnarounds in the Refining segment for 2025 and 2026, with the next planned turnaround at Wynnewood scheduled for 2027 [8] - The company is focusing on increasing distillate yield and jet fuel production, with projects underway to enhance capacity [24] - The company aims to reduce debt and restore balance sheet leverage ratios while looking for ways to improve capture and reduce costs [28] Management's Comments on Operating Environment and Future Outlook - Management noted that refining market conditions began to improve due to a heavy spring maintenance season and refinery closures [20] - The company expressed optimism about the demand for refined products, despite potential recession concerns [31] - Management highlighted the importance of government support for renewable businesses and the need for clarity on credits before making further investments [60] Other Important Information - The company ended Q1 2025 with a consolidated cash balance of $695 million and total liquidity of approximately $894 million [18] - Significant cash uses included $94 million for capital and turnaround spending and $113 million for working capital [18] Q&A Session Summary Question: Understanding refining macro and demand - Management indicated that days of supply have shrunk, suggesting a correction in the supply-demand balance, with expectations for improved gasoline demand in the summer [31] Question: RVO and SRE implications - Management believes decoupling D4 and D6 is important and criticized the government's handling of the RFS, emphasizing the need for lower RIN prices to benefit consumers [34][36] Question: Renewable diesel EBITDA and future expectations - Management noted that RIN prices and feedstock costs are critical for maintaining positive EBITDA in the renewable segment, with ongoing uncertainty regarding the PTC [40][41] Question: Industry consolidation and economies of scale - Management agreed that economies of scale are essential for survival and acknowledged potential for further consolidation in the refining sector [45] Question: Update on Coffeyville turnaround - Management acknowledged challenges during the Coffeyville turnaround but expressed confidence in recovering strong margins moving forward [52] Question: Jet fuel expansion and customer contracts - Management is optimistic about securing contracts with major airlines as existing contracts come up for renewal [57] Question: Assurance for renewable investments - Management emphasized the need for stable government support and clarity on credits before committing to new renewable projects [60]

Financial Data and Key Metrics Changes - For Q1 2025, the company reported a net loss of $595 million or $1.90 per share, compared to a net income of $1.2 billion or $3.75 per share in Q1 2024 [12] - Adjusted net income for Q1 2025 was $282 million or $0.89 per share, down from $1.3 billion or $3.84 per share in Q1 2024 [12] - The refining segment reported an operating loss of $530 million in Q1 2025, compared to an operating income of $1.7 billion in Q1 2024 [12] - Refining throughput volumes averaged 2.8 million barrels per day with a capacity utilization of 89% in Q1 2025 [13] Business Line Data and Key Metrics Changes - The Renewable Diesel segment reported an operating loss of $141 million in Q1 2025, down from an operating income of $190 million in Q1 2024 [13] - Ethanol segment operating income was $20 million in Q1 2025, compared to $10 million in Q1 2024 [13] - Ethanol production volumes averaged 4.5 million gallons per day in Q1 2025 [14] Market Data and Key Metrics Changes - U.S. light product demand showed a slight increase compared to last year, with product inventories below the same period last year [8] - Diesel sales volumes increased by 6% year-over-year, supported by higher agricultural demand [26] - Total light product demand globally increased by approximately 1 million barrels per day year-over-year [29] Company Strategy and Development Direction - The company is focused on operational excellence, capital deployment with a focus on returns, and maintaining shareholder returns [10] - A $230 million SEC unit optimization project is underway to increase the yield of high-value products, expected to start in 2026 [9] - The company anticipates tight product supply and demand balances, with low product inventories supporting refining fundamentals ahead of the driving season [10] Management Comments on Operating Environment and Future Outlook - Management noted that refining margins improved through the quarter despite a tough margin environment in the renewable diesel segment [7] - The company expects refining throughput volumes to fall within specific ranges for Q2 2025, with cash operating expenses projected at $5.15 per barrel [18][19] - Management expressed confidence in the resilience of the portfolio despite macroeconomic uncertainties [98] Other Important Information - The company returned $633 million to shareholders in Q1 2025, with a payout ratio of 73% [16] - The company ended the quarter with $8.5 billion in total debt and $4.6 billion in cash and cash equivalents, indicating a strong balance sheet [17] Q&A Session Summary Question: Market dynamics and crude differentials - Management noted that sales through the wholesale system were down a few percent, but product exports were up year-over-year [25] - Diesel sales were supported by higher agricultural demand, with total light product inventory drawing down to below the five-year average [30][31] Question: Guidance for Q2 and maintenance impacts - Management confirmed that lower guidance for Q2 is primarily due to maintenance activities, particularly in the North Atlantic and Mid Continent regions [48][49] Question: Decision to close the Peninsula refinery - Management explained that the decision was influenced by California's stringent regulatory environment and the higher costs associated with maintaining the facility [58] Question: Renewable diesel market normalization - Management indicated that the market is still adjusting to the new PTC regime, with expectations for improvement in the back half of the year [75] Question: Update on import permit in Mexico - Management confirmed the reinstatement of the import permit after demonstrating compliance with Mexican authorities [89][90] Question: Cash balance and share buybacks - Management emphasized the strength of the balance sheet and the commitment to returning cash to shareholders through buybacks [97] Question: Diesel inventory outlook - Management acknowledged the tight diesel inventory situation in the U.S. and the potential for increased volatility in the market [148]

Financial Data and Key Metrics Changes - For Q1 2025, the company reported a net loss of $595 million or $1.90 per share, compared to a net income of $1.2 billion or $3.75 per share in Q1 2024 [12] - Adjusted net income for Q1 2025 was $282 million or $0.89 per share, down from $1.3 billion or $3.84 per share in Q1 2024 [12] - The refining segment reported an operating loss of $530 million in Q1 2025, compared to an operating income of $1.7 billion in Q1 2024 [12] - Refining throughput averaged 2.8 million barrels per day with a capacity utilization of 89% [13] Business Line Data and Key Metrics Changes - The Renewable Diesel segment reported an operating loss of $141 million in Q1 2025, down from an operating income of $190 million in Q1 2024 [13] - Ethanol segment operating income was $20 million in Q1 2025, up from $10 million in Q1 2024 [13] - Renewable diesel sales volumes averaged 2.4 million gallons per day in Q1 2025 [13] Market Data and Key Metrics Changes - U.S. light product demand was slightly higher than last year, with product inventories below the same period last year [8] - Diesel sales showed a 6% year-over-year increase, supported by higher agricultural demand [26] - Total light product demand globally increased by approximately 1 million barrels per day year-over-year [29] Company Strategy and Development Direction - The company is focused on operational excellence, capital deployment with a focus on returns, and maintaining shareholder returns [10] - A $230 million SEC unit optimization project is underway to increase the yield of high-value products, expected to start in 2026 [9] - The company anticipates tight product supply and demand balances, with low product inventories supporting refining fundamentals ahead of the driving season [10] Management's Comments on Operating Environment and Future Outlook - Management noted a resilient economy despite macro uncertainties, with expectations of tight gasoline supply in California due to refinery closures [58][148] - The company expects refining cash operating expenses in Q2 2025 to be $5.15 per barrel [19] - Management expressed confidence in the ability to return cash to shareholders, with a commitment to share buybacks supported by a strong balance sheet [98] Other Important Information - The company returned $633 million to shareholders in Q1 2025, with a payout ratio of 73% [16] - The company ended Q1 2025 with $8.5 billion in total debt and $4.6 billion in cash and cash equivalents [17] - The company expects capital investments for 2025 to be approximately $2 billion, with $1.6 billion allocated to sustaining the business [18] Q&A Session Summary Question: Market dynamics and crude differentials - Management noted that sales through the wholesale system were down a few percent, but product exports were up year-over-year [25] - Diesel sales were supported by higher agricultural demand, with a year-over-year increase in gasoline sales of 1% [26] Question: Guidance for Q2 and maintenance impacts - Management confirmed that lower guidance for Q2 is primarily due to maintenance activities, particularly in the North Atlantic and Mid Continent regions [48][106] Question: Decision to close the Peninsula refinery - Management explained that stringent regulatory environments in California influenced the decision to close the refinery, with higher maintenance costs compared to Wilmington [58] Question: Renewable diesel market normalization - Management indicated that the market is adjusting to new PTC regulations, with expectations for improvement in the back half of the year [75] Question: Update on import permit in Mexico - Management confirmed the reinstatement of the import permit after demonstrating compliance with Mexican authorities [89] Question: Cash balance and share buybacks - Management emphasized the strength of the balance sheet and the commitment to returning cash to shareholders through buybacks [98] Question: Diesel inventory outlook - Management acknowledged that California may face gasoline shortages in the coming years, leading to potential volatility in margins [148]

Core Viewpoint - Valero Energy Corporation (VLO) reported a significant adjusted loss in Q1 2025, contrasting sharply with prior earnings and consensus estimates, primarily due to asset impairments and declining refining margins [1][2]. Financial Performance - The adjusted loss for Q1 2025 was $1.90 per share, compared to earnings of $3.82 in the same quarter last year [1]. - Total revenues decreased from $31,759 million in the prior-year quarter to $30,258 million, although this figure exceeded the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $28,450 million [1]. - Adjusted operating income in the Refining segment fell to $605 million from $1.8 billion year-over-year, missing the estimate of $1,022 million [3]. - The Ethanol segment reported an adjusted operating profit of $20 million, down from $39 million in the prior-year quarter, also missing the estimate of $55.1 million [4]. - The Renewable Diesel segment experienced an operating loss of $141 million, a decline from an operating income of $190 million in the previous year [5]. Operational Metrics - Refining throughput volumes increased to 2,828 thousand barrels per day (MBbls/d) from 2,760 MBbls/d year-over-year, surpassing the estimate of 2,786 MBbls/d [6]. - The Gulf Coast region contributed 59.1% to total throughput volume, with Mid-Continent, North Atlantic, and West Coast regions accounting for 16%, 17.4%, and 7.5%, respectively [7]. Margins and Costs - The refining margin per barrel of throughput decreased to $9.78 from $14.07 in the prior year, while operating expenses per barrel rose to $5.07 from $4.71 [8]. - Total cost of sales slightly decreased to $29,751 million from $29,776 million year-over-year, attributed to lower material costs [9]. Capital Investment and Balance Sheet - Capital investment for Q1 totaled $660 million, with $582 million allocated for sustaining the business [10]. - As of March 31, 2025, the company had cash and cash equivalents of $4.6 billion, total debt of $8.5 billion, and finance lease obligations of $2.3 billion [11].

Core Viewpoint - Valero Energy (VLO) is expected to report a significant decline in quarterly earnings and revenues, with analysts predicting earnings of $0.43 per share, an 88.7% decrease year-over-year, and revenues of $28.45 billion, a 10.4% decrease from the previous year [1]. Earnings Estimates - Over the last 30 days, the consensus EPS estimate for the quarter has been revised upward by 8.3%, indicating a collective reassessment by analysts [2]. - Revisions to earnings projections are crucial for predicting investor behavior and are strongly correlated with short-term stock price performance [3]. Revenue Projections - Analysts estimate 'Total operating revenues - Renewable diesel' at $635.55 million, reflecting a 55% decrease from the prior-year quarter [5]. - The 'Total operating revenues - Ethanol' is projected to be $997.56 million, indicating a 9.6% decline from the year-ago quarter [5]. - 'Total operating revenues - Refining' is expected to be $27.22 billion, showing a year-over-year change of -9.7% [6]. Refining Margins - The consensus for 'U.S. Mid-Continent region - Refining margin per barrel of throughput' is $8.98, down from $13.20 in the same quarter last year [6]. - For the 'U.S. West Coast region - Refining margin per barrel of throughput', the estimate is $11.51, compared to $12.62 a year ago [7]. - The 'U.S. Gulf Coast region - Refining margin per barrel of throughput' is projected at $8.87, down from $14.11 in the same quarter last year [7]. Throughput Volumes - Analysts predict 'Refining - Total Throughput volumes per day' to be 2,824.11 thousand barrels of oil, an increase from 2,760 thousand barrels of oil year-over-year [8]. - 'U.S. Gulf Coast region - Throughput volumes per day' is expected to reach 1,732.09 thousand barrels of oil, up from 1,594 thousand barrels of oil in the same quarter last year [8]. - 'U.S. Mid-Continent region - Throughput volumes per day' is forecasted at 426.77 thousand barrels of oil, down from 452 thousand barrels of oil a year ago [9]. Regional Insights - 'North Atlantic region - Throughput volumes per day' is estimated at 465.99 thousand barrels of oil, slightly up from 449 thousand barrels of oil in the previous year [10]. - The estimated 'North Atlantic region - Refining margin per barrel of throughput' is $11.82, down from $15.67 in the same quarter last year [10]. Stock Performance - Valero Energy shares have returned -17.5% over the past month, underperforming the Zacks S&P 500 composite, which saw a -8.9% change [11].

Core Viewpoint - Elliott Investment Management argues that Phillips 66 has consistently underperformed compared to its industry peers, with shares lagging behind Valero Energy and Marathon Petroleum by -138% and -188% over the past decade, respectively [1][10]. Group 1: Streamline 66 Plan - Elliott proposes a three-part "Streamline 66" plan aimed at increasing Phillips' stock price to over $200 per share, which includes simplifying the portfolio, reviewing refinery operations, and enhancing Board oversight [2][12]. - The plan emphasizes the need to divest non-core assets, such as the midstream business, which could be valued at over $40 billion, to focus on improving refining operations [21]. Group 2: Board Accountability and Governance - Elliott advocates for all directors to commit to a one-year term and stand for election at each Annual Meeting, enhancing accountability and governance [3][31]. - The current staggered Board structure limits accountability, and past proposals to address this have failed due to the high voting threshold required [32][34]. Group 3: Director Nominees - Elliott has nominated four highly qualified director candidates to bring necessary experience and perspectives to the Board, including individuals with significant backgrounds in refining and energy sectors [6][29]. - The nominees are expected to enhance Board independence and oversight, which is crucial for restoring investor trust and improving company performance [30]. Group 4: Historical Context and Comparisons - Elliott draws parallels with Marathon Petroleum, which successfully implemented changes after Elliott's engagement, resulting in a ~150% relative outperformance in share price [11]. - The letter highlights that Phillips 66's management has resisted necessary changes and has not prioritized shareholder value, leading to ongoing underperformance [9][25].