Financial Data and Key Metrics Changes - Q2 revenue was $274.1 million, a decline of 3.4% from $283.8 million in the prior year, primarily due to lower eye and ear care category sales and cough and cold category sales [10][11] - Adjusted EPS was $1.07, slightly down from $1.09 in the prior year, but ahead of expectations due to sales performance [10][11] - Free cash flow for the first half was $134 million, up 10% year-over-year, with a full-year outlook of $245 million or more [5][15] Business Line Data and Key Metrics Changes - The North America segment saw a revenue decrease of 6.1%, while the international segment experienced a revenue increase of 2.7% [11][12] - E-commerce consumption growth remained strong, with double-digit year-over-year growth, driven by long-term investments [4][11] - The DenTek brand achieved over 50% market share in its category, with a focus on dental guards contributing significantly to revenue [6][8] Market Data and Key Metrics Changes - The overall market for eye care products has declined, impacting Clear Eyes' supply and market share [44] - International OTC segment business increased, supported by higher Hydralyte sales, despite Q2 being affected by distributor order timing [12][14] Company Strategy and Development Direction - The company is focused on diversifying its portfolio and channels to drive long-term growth, with a particular emphasis on e-commerce and brand building [4][6] - Plans to enhance shareholder value through share repurchases and potential M&A opportunities, including the acquisition of Pillar Five for approximately $100 million [16][18] - The company anticipates a revenue range of $1.1 billion to $1.115 billion for fiscal 2026, with organic growth expected to decline by approximately 1.5% to 3% [17] Management's Comments on Operating Environment and Future Outlook - Management noted heightened uncertainty in the business environment due to supply chain constraints, high inflation, and geopolitical events [3] - Confidence in the business strategy and diversified portfolio is strong, with expectations for improved supply of Clear Eyes in the second half of the year [17][34] - The company has not seen significant impacts from macroeconomic trends on its needs-based product categories [33][34] Other Important Information - Gross margin for the first half was 55.7%, up 60 basis points year-over-year, with expectations for a gross margin of approximately 56.5% for the full year [12][14] - Advertising and marketing expenses were down due to timing, expected to be 14% of sales for the full year, with Q3 anticipated to have the highest spend rate [13][14] Q&A Session Summary Question: Follow-up on Clear Eyes supply and shelf space - Management confirmed that supply chain improvements are expected to benefit Q3 and Q4, but acknowledged a reduction in market share due to supply constraints [21][23] Question: Cold and cough season expectations - Management indicated that the cold and flu category is not a significant revenue driver, and it is too early to predict performance for the upcoming season [25] Question: Retailer inventories health - Retail inventories have been steady, with no significant impacts from performance issues, aside from e-commerce order patterns [27] Question: Women's health performance - Women's health category experienced noise in order patterns, but overall performance remains positive over the trailing twelve months [29][46] Question: Macro environment impact - Management noted that while consumer trends are slowing, their needs-based products are somewhat insulated from broader economic pressures [33][34] Question: Capital allocation and M&A strategy - The company remains focused on M&A opportunities while also prioritizing share repurchases, with a disciplined approach to capital allocation [37][39] Question: Clear Eyes marketing investment post-supply improvement - Future marketing investments will be evaluated based on opportunities, with no immediate increase in overall A&M spending anticipated [65][67] Question: Private label competition - No significant changes in market share or impact from private label competition were reported [68]